The Anglicans and Scandinavian Lutherans AFAIK trace their bishops' line of succession to the apostles, although the EOs don't consider them to be legitimate lines because they are outside Orthodoxy.
The Anglicans AFAIK have 7 sacraments. I don't remember offhand if they have Chrismation and unction. Whereas EOs typically only accept the RC and Lutheran view of the Direct, Objective Presence in the Eucharist, the Anglicans include only the Lutheran or Calvinist views on the Eucharist. In fact, the Articles of Religion have an internal contradiction on the point- both two parties (those holding Lutheran and Calvinist views) tried to put their own position in the Articles while also negating their opponents' views. So for instance, In one part the Lutheran view is expounded, whereas in another, it is rejected. The rejection of the Lutheran view is expressed in the article that says that the unworthy do not eat Christ's body when they eat the Eucharist bread. The point of that article was to de facto make the idea of "eating" Christ's body to mean something purely nonphysical, so that Christ's body is meant to be "eaten" only by the worthy and only in a "spiritualistic"/ ie. virtual sense. The Lutheran party in contrast said that since Christ is in the bread, then both the worthy and unworthy chew it. This inner conflict in Anglicanism on the topic of the Real Presence has never been actually recognized and openly addressed by the C.O.E. De facto what happened is that both parties accepted the other ones' members as legitimate Anglicans. So eg. as to whether the Anglican Church and its bishops accepted you, it didn't matter as to which view you held on the Real Presence.
As far as sacraments, the Lutherans have 7, but they call 4 of them ordinances, not sacraments. And instead of Chrismation, they have Confirmation. Lutheranism teaches that Christ is directly and objectively present in the bread in Spirit form like when He passed through the locked door to appear to the disciples. I take this to be like the view of Pope Gelasius, who considered the Eucharist food to have both the substance of Bread and the substance of His body. This was a sticking point that Luther had against the Calvinists, who believed that Jesus could not be directly, objectively present in the bread.
