Is this word hellenism the translation of the word romiosini? Because the vast majority of Christians today, except for perhaps the Church of the East and perhaps really radical Protestants, are part of Churches who are all ultimately descended from or evangelised by the missionaries from the mother Church of the Roman Empire. This means that the Christianity we love so dear first became a major world religion dressed in the culture of romanitas. The philosophical world view of many Christians and the pronouncements of our councils are expressed and enshrined in hellenistic conceptions and many of our Christianised languages borrow heavily from Greek or Latin. Our vestments are descended from the dress of the upper classes of that empire, and our ecclesiastical poetry is heavily influenced by classicising notions of literary aesthetics. Many of our ancient Churches are built in the basilica style or, at the very least, have naves inspired by the architectural space of early Roman church buildings. Russia itself was Christianised due to Byzantine missionaries, and the early Slavic states in that part of the world either consciously modelled themselves on Byzantine culture and monarchy, or reacted to it and distinguished itself in relation to it.
So I'm willing to grant, if the word hellenism is a translation of romiosini, the large role that hellenistic culture plays in the history of our God-inspired faith, but what exactly does it mean for hellenistic culture (or any other Christianised culture for that matter) to have "primacy?" I understand how the EP can claim a primacy of honour, but how does a culture have "primacy," and how does this "primacy" affect the daily lives of people who are part of that culture and those people who aren't? There are no Jews or Levites among Christians. All tribes and nations that accept baptism and the anointing of Chrism are joined to the same priestly people. So how does any given culture, nation or tribe even go about, in the day-to-day life, enacting this "primacy?" Am I suppose to highly venerate or view with some kind of pious trepidation the Greek dude in my office? Or is it some kind of collective racial infallibility whereby when the majority of Greeks in the Greek Churches believe in something or practice something, that it should be taken as inspired by the rest of the Church? What does that mean? I'm very confused.
Do the Fathers ever mention the word "hellenism" or "romiosini" or "romanitas" or any such concepts? I thought they only played a cultural and socio-historical role in Christianity but did not constitute truly spiritual matters?
I thank anyone in advance for their response.