orthonorm
Hoplitarches
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2010
- Messages
- 17,715
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Cause you are a n00b.biro said:I've never seen troll defined as something positive.
Share your cred.
Cause you are a n00b.biro said:I've never seen troll defined as something positive.
To quote an expert:orthonorm said:Cause you are a n00b.biro said:I've never seen troll defined as something positive.
Share your cred.
http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,35307.msg556858.html#msg556858I remember back in the day when trolls were welcome clever people to keep newsgroups on their toes. The word has been watered down to the least common of denominators.
I used troll pretty hard. I knew of one troll who probably pulled the biggest job on a group once. Involved a faked death after years of posting and appearing later at a meet-up. Everyone since having a great sense of humor and old to the internet game gave nothing but respect to the guy.
GiC could troll if he wanted to, God knows he has enough brain cells and expertise to probably sock puppet at least five believable experts on this forum.
That would imply that his ego.....wait....Azurestone said:Did you seriously just quote yourself as proof?
Um, no. I've been on boards and in chat rooms for at least 16 years.orthonorm said:Cause you are a n00b.biro said:I've never seen troll defined as something positive.
Share your cred.
Well, for once you're correct (don't let it go to your head, it's just once). While I'm willing to spend hours looking through the Bible, Church Fathers, etc. coming up with posts for this site, with most of the content frankly having little to no practical application or benefit for me, nonetheless I had no intentions of responding to some of the posts in this thread. Some problems would be too frustrating to try to fix, some problems are obviously dumb arguments to begin with, and yet other problems would require that someone change a major part of their world view before they admitted that they were wrong.theo philosopher said:As for the thread itself - I know better than to try to respond to it point-by-point. It's an inherent "troll" thread with people who have no intention of defending their claims. So why bother?![]()
It's like you are looking over my shoulder.Asteriktos said:Many seemed not to pick up on it's tone, and tried to turn it into a debate. Which I guess I should have expected; and yet, as I said earlier, is a bit depressing.
Considering your flirtations with atheism I took it seriously. My apologies.Asteriktos said:Well, for once you're correct (don't let it go to your head, it's just once). While I'm willing to spend hours looking through the Bible, Church Fathers, etc. coming up with posts for this site, with most of the content frankly having little to no practical application or benefit for me, nonetheless I had no intentions of responding to some of the posts in this thread. Some problems would be too frustrating to try to fix, some problems are obviously dumb arguments to begin with, and yet other problems would require that someone change a major part of their world view before they admitted that they were wrong.theo philosopher said:As for the thread itself - I know better than to try to respond to it point-by-point. It's an inherent "troll" thread with people who have no intention of defending their claims. So why bother?![]()
Though now that I think about it, 90% of the arguments are probably a bit of all three.
A priest (who was actually a practicing psychologist in his secular life) once told me that I don't suffer fools gladly. He was to a large extent right. Though I've learned to keep my mouth shut a lot of the time.
Btw, this thread was originally meant to be light hearted. Hence the winking emoticon as part of the Message Icon. There was also the "Ahh, now I feel better" thing. So much for that!olice: Many seemed not to pick up on it's tone, and tried to turn it into a debate. Which I guess I should have expected; and yet, as I said earlier, is a bit depressing.
Turn around.orthonorm said:It's like you are looking over my shoulder.Asteriktos said:Many seemed not to pick up on it's tone, and tried to turn it into a debate. Which I guess I should have expected; and yet, as I said earlier, is a bit depressing.
This is surprising. //:=)Azurestone said:Did you seriously just quote yourself as proof?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#Early_historyCommonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been discussed a lot, but new subscribers to the group would not realize, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a practice to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution
16 years . . . let's do the math, it's like 2011?biro said:Um, no. I've been on boards and in chat rooms for at least 16 years.orthonorm said:Cause you are a n00b.biro said:I've never seen troll defined as something positive.
Share your cred.
How would you even know?
The only people who think trolling is positive are, of course, trolls.
Don't turn aroundIsmiLiora said:Turn around.orthonorm said:It's like you are looking over my shoulder.Asteriktos said:Many seemed not to pick up on it's tone, and tried to turn it into a debate. Which I guess I should have expected; and yet, as I said earlier, is a bit depressing.
Don't want him hitting on your girl? Totally acceptable or understandable. I get those two confused. //:=)Aposphet said:Considering your flirtations with atheism I took it seriously. My apologies.
I'm going to start quoting music I know.IsmiLiora said:LOVE THAT SONG.
She's been a faithless whore.orthonorm said:Don't want him hitting on your girl? Totally acceptable or understandable. I get those two confused. //:=)Aposphet said:Considering your flirtations with atheism I took it seriously. My apologies.
NICE!!!Aposphet said:She's been a faithless whore.orthonorm said:Don't want him hitting on your girl? Totally acceptable or understandable. I get those two confused. //:=)Aposphet said:Considering your flirtations with atheism I took it seriously. My apologies.
Oh wah, you're so old, I'm a hipster, I know, I know. :laugh:orthonorm said:I'm going to start quoting music I know.IsmiLiora said:LOVE THAT SONG.
My friends are amazed at what I don't know or have even heard of at karaoke.
Sorry :-\Asteriktos said:Well, for once you're correct (don't let it go to your head, it's just once). While I'm willing to spend hours looking through the Bible, Church Fathers, etc. coming up with posts for this site, with most of the content frankly having little to no practical application or benefit for me, nonetheless I had no intentions of responding to some of the posts in this thread. Some problems would be too frustrating to try to fix, some problems are obviously dumb arguments to begin with, and yet other problems would require that someone change a major part of their world view before they admitted that they were wrong.theo philosopher said:As for the thread itself - I know better than to try to respond to it point-by-point. It's an inherent "troll" thread with people who have no intention of defending their claims. So why bother?![]()
Though now that I think about it, 90% of the arguments are probably a bit of all three.
A priest (who was actually a practicing psychologist in his secular life) once told me that I don't suffer fools gladly. He was to a large extent right. Though I've learned to keep my mouth shut a lot of the time.
Btw, this thread was originally meant to be light hearted. Hence the winking emoticon as part of the Message Icon. There was also the "Ahh, now I feel better" thing. So much for that!olice: Many seemed not to pick up on it's tone, and tried to turn it into a debate. Which I guess I should have expected; and yet, as I said earlier, is a bit depressing.
If you wanna leave, I won't beg you to stay.Aposphet said:
I mean, I don't know hardly any of the stuff, I ain't talking marginal stuff. All white people music.IsmiLiora said:Oh wah, you're so old, I'm a hipster, I know, I know. :laugh:orthonorm said:I'm going to start quoting music I know.IsmiLiora said:LOVE THAT SONG.
My friends are amazed at what I don't know or have even heard of at karaoke.
And a lot of it depends on upbringing. My father and mother blasted Eurodance all throughout my childhood. They have videos of me dancing to the stuff.
I know a lot of random music but I fail whenever I pick a Beatles song on the Cranium Humdingers category. I can only hum the verse line. No one would want to be on my team for that part, but I knock out the Gnilleps every single time.
I gotta start writing lyrics . . .IsmiLiora said:If you wanna leave, I won't beg you to stay.Aposphet said:
And if you go, darling, maybe it's better that way.
I'm gonna be strong, I'm gonna be fine, don't worry about this heart of mine.
(Genius stuff, amirite?)
Whatever was ostensibly popular, like everyone in the bar knows and I am clueless.IsmiLiora said:What are you classifying as white people music, now?
Orthonorm, bro, are you some kind of self-loathing hipster?orthonorm said:Whatever was ostensibly popular, like everyone in the bar knows and I am clueless.IsmiLiora said:What are you classifying as white people music, now?
Ummm they all cheer and love the schlocky music in an ironic manner. I grew around black and hicks.akimori makoto said:Orthonorm, bro, are you some kind of self-loathing hipster?orthonorm said:Whatever was ostensibly popular, like everyone in the bar knows and I am clueless.IsmiLiora said:What are you classifying as white people music, now?
I didn't say they were. Rather, I said that Atheists can have no objective standard by which to judge what is or isn't good, certainly there are many Christians like this as well.orthonorm said:Not for this to descend into unhappy, unfun, but Christians have been really steady and in agrement in their morals over the millennia. lulz. If you want to argue about this, not only do I have proof but also a place where you do it:JamesRottnek said:Atheists can be good, but they can never really have a standard (that isn't arbitrary) by which to judge their own goodness.
http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/
And yet what?Asteriktos said:Yeah, but don't you kinda find it depressing? I mean, these aren't dumb people here, and yet...orthonorm said:*, brilliant. You are getting them to come and say there own crazy things in earnest.![]()
You know, my buddy has some bluegrass rap music.orthonorm said:Ummm they all cheer and love the schlocky music in an ironic manner. I grew around black and hicks.akimori makoto said:Orthonorm, bro, are you some kind of self-loathing hipster?orthonorm said:Whatever was ostensibly popular, like everyone in the bar knows and I am clueless.IsmiLiora said:What are you classifying as white people music, now?
White people music is what it has been since Roman times. Metal!IsmiLiora said:What are you classifying as white people music, now?
I hope you are brilliantly playing the straight man here , but I fear you are not. (I swear no innuendo about RCs there. Seriously.)Papist said:And yet what?Asteriktos said:Yeah, but don't you kinda find it depressing? I mean, these aren't dumb people here, and yet...orthonorm said:*, brilliant. You are getting them to come and say there own crazy things in earnest.![]()
Eh, for a bit I felt like some people were being trollish as well, but I've since realised that this isn't the case. Some people are consistent in how they approach things like this, and I shouldn't have expected otherwise on this thread.Azurestone said:What's the official, 73et $p34k, better-than-crack, word for troll?
The name of either two of the newer notorious posters here. Both names begin with the same letter and end with the same sound.Azurestone said:What's the official, 73et $p34k, better-than-crack, word for troll?
All that she wants is another baby...eeyyoIsmiLiora said:If you wanna leave, I won't beg you to stay.Aposphet said:
And if you go, darling, maybe it's better that way.
I'm gonna be strong, I'm gonna be fine, don't worry about this heart of mine.
(Genius stuff, amirite?)
Please review the thread, now that some time has passed.Papist said:And yet what?Asteriktos said:Yeah, but don't you kinda find it depressing? I mean, these aren't dumb people here, and yet...orthonorm said:*, brilliant. You are getting them to come and say there own crazy things in earnest.![]()
You'd have to define the term, "religion." While atheism may not have rituals and sacraments, it is certainly a dogmatically held belief system.Justin Kissel said:1) Atheism is a religion
Atheists try very hard to create moral systems of their own, but they can't rationally justify those systems. I agree with the atheist Sartre: If there is no God, then everything is permissible.Justin Kissel said:2) Atheists have no morality of their own, and just steal Christian morality
This may be true of some atheists, but I don't life inside of atheists' heads, so I don't know the percentage. I do know that human beings are not always objective in their quest for knowledge and truth.Justin Kissel said:3) They're only atheists because they want to continue their perverted practices
This may be true of some, but not all atheists.Justin Kissel said:4) Atheists are just people who are angry at God
It is interesting that Christianity seems to be the favorite target of atheists. I doubt they consciously attack it thinking, "this is the one true religion, so I must destroy it." Of course, the Devil may influence atheists to attach Christianity for this very reason.Justin Kissel said:5) Atheists only attack Christians, because Christianity is the one true religion
I have yet to see a good, objective reason that an atheist can give for not being a nihilist.Justin Kissel said:6) Atheism logically leads to nihilism, so they should just kill themselves
I'm not sure what this means. I will say that I have a great time shattering atheists' preconceived notions of what I, as a Christian and philosopher, think about the world.Justin Kissel said:7) Only people on the internet listen to atheists, never in real life
I can't speak from personal experience on this one, but stereotypes exist for a reason.Justin Kissel said:8 ) Atheists are usually adult men living in the basement of their parents
Again, I'm not an atheist, so I can't speak from personal experience. I don't love or hate evolution. It's just a scientific fact that I accept.Justin Kissel said:9) Atheists love evolution because it gives them an excuse to act like an animal
I think this is definitely true of popular atheists who refuse to engage in meaningful discussion with the thought and works of intelligent theistic apologists. In fact, I think it is definitely true of Dawkins, since he purposefully misrepresents the best arguments of his best opponents.Justin Kissel said:10) Atheists are blind and refuse to see the overwhelming evidence for the existence of God
That's actually a statistical fact when one takes into account communism and abortion.Justin Kissel said:11) Atheism has caused more death in the world than any other religion
From my experience, most of the atheists with whom I converse usually are reacting against protestant fundamentalism.Justin Kissel said:12) Atheism arose due to a warped western Christian theology
Well, I'm glad you feel better. That's what's ultimately important.Justin Kissel said:[Ahhh, I feel much better]
Other crazy things you've heard?
Done.Justin Kissel said:Please review the thread, now that some time has passed.Papist said:And yet what?Asteriktos said:Yeah, but don't you kinda find it depressing? I mean, these aren't dumb people here, and yet...orthonorm said:*, brilliant. You are getting them to come and say there own crazy things in earnest.![]()
![]()