Volnutt
Hoplitarches
- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Messages
- 15,089
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
I've been discussing this some with a Nontrinitarian recently. I maintain that, whatever Scriptural exegetical arguments one might make against the Trinity (not that I accept those arguments), it's ultimately a moot point simply because Arianism (or any form of Nontrinitarianism) failed to survive as a movement from antiquity to today. If the true Church is meant to be Nontrinitarian, then the gates of Hell will not triumph over her no matter how much persecution the Nicaea-accepting Empire might throw her way, right?
Best as I can tell, Arianism enjoyed official sanction from the Visigoth monarchs up until the 8th Century or so, after which time it vanished as an institution until Michael Servetus, Grzegorz Paweł z Brzezin, Faustus Sozzini, and others revived it in the 16th Century--for it to take root in Poland, Transylvania, and elsewhere and give rise to the modern Unitarian churches. But they are not in the same lineage as Arius or the Ebionites (maybe), they're Johnny-come-lately imitators just as much as the Jehovah's Witnesses are.
Claims that "they must have existed in the Middle Ages as small persecuted bands in that nobody has ever heard about," seem insufficient to me. At least the Landmark Baptists can make fallacious appeals to the Bogomils, Cathars, etc. Neo-Arians don't seem to have anything for the better half of a millennium.
Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way or know the history incompletely, though.
Best as I can tell, Arianism enjoyed official sanction from the Visigoth monarchs up until the 8th Century or so, after which time it vanished as an institution until Michael Servetus, Grzegorz Paweł z Brzezin, Faustus Sozzini, and others revived it in the 16th Century--for it to take root in Poland, Transylvania, and elsewhere and give rise to the modern Unitarian churches. But they are not in the same lineage as Arius or the Ebionites (maybe), they're Johnny-come-lately imitators just as much as the Jehovah's Witnesses are.
Claims that "they must have existed in the Middle Ages as small persecuted bands in that nobody has ever heard about," seem insufficient to me. At least the Landmark Baptists can make fallacious appeals to the Bogomils, Cathars, etc. Neo-Arians don't seem to have anything for the better half of a millennium.
Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way or know the history incompletely, though.