Mary/Maria, Despina, Panaghiota/Panaghiotis.Tallitot said:"Mary".
lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
I've been told that in the Russian tradition people do not take the Theotokos as a patron, but are named only after other Marys, but that it is common in other Orthodox traditions. So if this small "t" tradition is all someone has been exposed to I didn't think so crazy for someone to get this idea, albeit misinformed. If you want to laugh at somebody for their silly ideas take me: there is also the small (t) tradition that Godparents can't be married to each other (now or in the future) so when I was visiting a parish of another jurisdiction for a baptism and the Godparents were a married couple, I was internally horrified at the spiritually incestuous natureMor Ephrem said:lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
If Russians don't take the Theotokos as a patron, that's one thing, but to accuse those who do of impiety is rather ridiculous. Just my opinion.Bob2 said:I've been told that in the Russian tradition people do not take the Theotokos as a patron, but are named only after other Marys, but that it is common in other Orthodox traditions. So if this small "t" tradition is all someone has been exposed to I didn't think so crazy for someone to get this idea, albeit misinformed.Mor Ephrem said:lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
That's a bit more than small t.If you want to laugh at somebody for their silly ideas take me: there is also the small (t) tradition that Godparents can't be married to each other (now or in the future) so when I was visiting a parish of another jurisdiction for a baptism and the Godparents were a married couple, I was internally horrified at the spiritually incestuous nature![]()
So he didn't use that word, but you're assuming he would have based on his "tone?" What word(s) exactly did he use?Daedelus1138 said:While he did not explicitly say it was "impious", that was my impression based on the tone.
I'm trying to remember... I think he said "the only patron saint you should not take is Mary. That is not done" He also told us that we would be called that name at Communion.scamandrius said:So he didn't use that word, but you're assuming he would have based on his "tone?" What word(s) exactly did he use?
The Serbs have a different tradition, one of an entire male line or family having a patron of the day their village converted from paganism centuries ago.Daedelus1138 said:While he did not explicitly say it was "impious", that was my impression based on the tone.
I had a friend who had joined a Serbian Orthodox parish in Kansas and he told me that they don't even have personal patron saints, and when he converted it was not an issue that came up (I honestly didn't want a particular patron saint at all, but when I contemplated being called "Mary" at communion it was a bit too much).
I wonder if my parish was a bit hyperdox.
Greeks even take the Lord as their patron, so taking the Panagia is definitely not verboten.Mor Ephrem said:If Russians don't take the Theotokos as a patron, that's one thing, but to accuse those who do of impiety is rather ridiculous. Just my opinion.Bob2 said:I've been told that in the Russian tradition people do not take the Theotokos as a patron, but are named only after other Marys, but that it is common in other Orthodox traditions. So if this small "t" tradition is all someone has been exposed to I didn't think so crazy for someone to get this idea, albeit misinformed.Mor Ephrem said:lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
That's a bit more than small t.If you want to laugh at somebody for their silly ideas take me: there is also the small (t) tradition that Godparents can't be married to each other (now or in the future) so when I was visiting a parish of another jurisdiction for a baptism and the Godparents were a married couple, I was internally horrified at the spiritually incestuous nature![]()
Maria, Mariana, Marian, Mariela, Mara, Mario, Mika, Masha, Panaiot, Mira, Preslav, Preslava, Marina, Marin and Mariika.William said:Are there any names common among Orthodox people which have the Feast of the Dormition of Mary as a name day?
What is patron saint?Daedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
lol whatDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
God bless you!Indocern said:What is patron saint?Daedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
Yes I understood what is patron saint, it is like as for country to be st. Ivan Rilski. He is protecting our people. We have many other saints, but he is protector of our people.NicholasMyra said:God bless you!Indocern said:What is patron saint?Daedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
* This was the point I was trying to make, while understanding how someone could mistakenly come to that conclusion.Mor Ephrem said:If Russians don't take the Theotokos as a patron, that's one thing, * but to accuse those who do of impiety is rather ridiculous. Just my opinion.Bob2 said:I've been told that in the Russian tradition people do not take the Theotokos as a patron, but are named only after other Marys, but that it is common in other Orthodox traditions. So if this small "t" tradition is all someone has been exposed to I didn't think so crazy for someone to get this idea, albeit misinformed.Mor Ephrem said:lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
*That's a bit more than small t.If you want to laugh at somebody for their silly ideas take me: there is also the small (t) tradition that Godparents can't be married to each other (now or in the future) so when I was visiting a parish of another jurisdiction for a baptism and the Godparents were a married couple, I was internally horrified at the spiritually incestuous nature![]()
Dormition, Nativity and Pascha account for about half the name day celebrations in the country.Antonis said:Greeks even take the Lord as their patron, so taking the Panagia is definitely not verboten.Mor Ephrem said:If Russians don't take the Theotokos as a patron, that's one thing, but to accuse those who do of impiety is rather ridiculous. Just my opinion.Bob2 said:I've been told that in the Russian tradition people do not take the Theotokos as a patron, but are named only after other Marys, but that it is common in other Orthodox traditions. So if this small "t" tradition is all someone has been exposed to I didn't think so crazy for someone to get this idea, albeit misinformed.Mor Ephrem said:lolDaedelus1138 said:I was told by my Orthodox priest it was impious to take Mary as ones patron saint?
That's a bit more than small t.If you want to laugh at somebody for their silly ideas take me: there is also the small (t) tradition that Godparents can't be married to each other (now or in the future) so when I was visiting a parish of another jurisdiction for a baptism and the Godparents were a married couple, I was internally horrified at the spiritually incestuous nature![]()
Kim (for Kimisis)LBK said:Mary/Maria, Despina, Panaghiota/Panaghiotis.Tallitot said:"Mary".
The restrictions are between a person and their relations through the font - no marriage with their godparent, godsiblings (children of the godparent), or between koumbaroi (the parent of the baptized and the godparent).Bob2 said:* Is it? See even more I didn't know that you can laugh at me for ;D. Are you aware I'm talking about Godfather and Godmother, not other relations between the baptized or the Godparents offspring
I once found a list from the Georgian (I believe) website about when marriage is prohibited. If that list was commonly used I don't believe a marriage of two people from a 200-dwellers-village would be possible at all.Fr. George said:The restrictions are between a person and their relations through the font - no marriage with their godparent, godsiblings (children of the godparent), or between koumbaroi (the parent of the baptized and the godparent).
I believe that's only representative for Greek tradition.As for a married couple standing together to be godparents for a person entering the faith - it's a nice image and all, but technically there is only one sponsor. It has been the custom among aristocracy and royalty to have many honorary godparents, and a number of us "normal folk" choose to have that, but really only one person's name goes on the certificate and in the registry books.
I don't know about the Greek tradition abroad, but in Greece it is encouraged to have a married couple as sponsors. (I'm not sure about the only one name on the certificate bit; I believe mine cited both.) They are seen as surrogate parents, should something happen to the biological ones, and at least until recently, the law gave them precedence over grandparents and other relatives when it came to custody issues.Fr. George said:As for a married couple standing together to be godparents for a person entering the faith - it's a nice image and all, but technically there is only one sponsor. It has been the custom among aristocracy and royalty to have many honorary godparents, and a number of us "normal folk" choose to have that, but really only one person's name goes on the certificate and in the registry books.
Here is the guidance our parish has received from our priest, not suggesting this is the only tradition.Fr. George said:The restrictions are between a person and their relations through the font - no marriage with their godparent, godsiblings (children of the godparent), or between koumbaroi (the parent of the baptized and the godparent).Bob2 said:* Is it? See even more I didn't know that you can laugh at me for ;D. Are you aware I'm talking about Godfather and Godmother, not other relations between the baptized or the Godparents offspring
As for a married couple standing together to be godparents for a person entering the faith - it's a nice image and all, but technically there is only one sponsor. It has been the custom among aristocracy and royalty to have many honorary godparents, and a number of us "normal folk" choose to have that, but really only one person's name goes on the certificate and in the registry books.
I've heard it stated that the purpose was to expand the resources available to the baptized by having two families responsible for assisting in the spiritual welfare of the child.The choosing of Godparents if very important. The Godparents should be chosen with this in mind: that at the untimely death of the parents one of the Godparents would raise the child. Also, Godparents should participate in the spiritual upbringing of the child by making sure that the parents bring the child to Church regularly. Someone may be your good friend, but at the same time not make a good Godparent. The Godparents should be of an upstanding moral character, regular churchgoers, and not living in violation of the Church’s canons. The Godparent must be an Orthodox Christian. One Godparent of the same gender as the child is mandatory, a second (of the opposite gender) is optional. The two Godparents cannot be married to each other at the time of the baptism or in the future, as the spiritual bond of the Godparent with the child being baptized supercedes any possible bond between the two Godparents.
ftfyBob2 said:I've heard it stated that the purpose was to expand the resources available to the baptized by having two families responsible for assisting in thespiritualwelfare of the child.
No.Indocern said:Mariika.
Never heard of it, is it a Greek-American custom to name girls, Kimisis?Iconodule said:Kim (for Kimisis)LBK said:Mary/Maria, Despina, Panaghiota/Panaghiotis.Tallitot said:"Mary".
That is true although they do not have the right to legally adopt the child/children, they remain ανάδοχοι. Grandparents on the other hand have the right to legally adopt their grandchildrenArachne said:I don't know about the Greek tradition abroad, but in Greece it is encouraged to have a married couple as sponsors. (I'm not sure about the only one name on the certificate bit; I believe mine cited both.) They are seen as surrogate parents, should something happen to the biological ones, and at least until recently, the law gave them precedence over grandparents and other relatives when it came to custody issues.Fr. George said:As for a married couple standing together to be godparents for a person entering the faith - it's a nice image and all, but technically there is only one sponsor. It has been the custom among aristocracy and royalty to have many honorary godparents, and a number of us "normal folk" choose to have that, but really only one person's name goes on the certificate and in the registry books.
Why not? Actually Mariika is diminutival of Maria.hecma925 said:No.Indocern said:Mariika.
Maybe someone names their daughter "Kim(berly)" and then looks for a name day for her.Apostolos said:Never heard of it, is it a Greek-American custom to name girls, Kimisis?Iconodule said:Kim (for Kimisis)LBK said:Mary/Maria, Despina, Panaghiota/Panaghiotis.Tallitot said:"Mary".
[/quote]mike said:I once found a list from the Georgian (I believe) website about when marriage is prohibited. If that list was commonly used I don't believe a marriage of two people from a 200-dwellers-village would be possible at all.
We encourage the same often times - but still only one of their names goes on the certificate. The point is, of course, moot with a married couple - they are "one," so if one is listed on the certificate they are both still the godparents.Arachne said:I don't know about the Greek tradition abroad, but in Greece it is encouraged to have a married couple as sponsors. (I'm not sure about the only one name on the certificate bit; I believe mine cited both.)Fr. George said:As for a married couple standing together to be godparents for a person entering the faith - it's a nice image and all, but technically there is only one sponsor. It has been the custom among aristocracy and royalty to have many honorary godparents, and a number of us "normal folk" choose to have that, but really only one person's name goes on the certificate and in the registry books.
Tell me about it. My grandfather was raised by his godparents after his parents died (he was 10), and my father brought his godson (and the godson's sister) into our house when their father was unable to raise them. We take being sponsors very seriously in our family tree - in this case, the Water of baptism is truly "thicker than blood."Arachne said:They are seen as surrogate parents, should something happen to the biological ones, and at least until recently, the law gave them precedence over grandparents and other relatives when it came to custody issues.
That could well be true. I was baptized by two people (but only one name on the certificate) who were not married to each other (and in turn they married other people). It meant I had two sets of godparents growing up, which was a double blessing because each couple was "strong" in a different element of the Orthodox life.Bob2 said:Here is the guidance our parish has received from our priest, not suggesting this is the only tradition.
I've heard it stated that the purpose was to expand the resources available to the baptized by having two families responsible for assisting in the spiritual welfare of the child.The choosing of Godparents if very important. The Godparents should be chosen with this in mind: that at the untimely death of the parents one of the Godparents would raise the child. Also, Godparents should participate in the spiritual upbringing of the child by making sure that the parents bring the child to Church regularly. Someone may be your good friend, but at the same time not make a good Godparent. The Godparents should be of an upstanding moral character, regular churchgoers, and not living in violation of the Church’s canons. The Godparent must be an Orthodox Christian. One Godparent of the same gender as the child is mandatory, a second (of the opposite gender) is optional. The two Godparents cannot be married to each other at the time of the baptism or in the future, as the spiritual bond of the Godparent with the child being baptized supercedes any possible bond between the two Godparents.