TheTrisagion said:
kelly said:
TheTrisagion said:
Interesting, why not? I've actually never heard of anyone converting in between OO and EO although I'm sure it happens, but I would imagine that an OO who converts to EO would have to accept Chalcedon.
I don't think OO's joining Antioch have to renounce anything.
I'm not even sure they permit an OO to join Antioch. I think when they began intercommuning laity, it was agreed that they would not "poach" parishioners.
If I understand correctly the explanation I received from a priest who has dealt with this in a parish, an Oriental Orthodox who wishes to participate in an Antiochian Orthodox community first talks to the priest. The priest probably has to consult with the bishop (I forget about this part), and then if there aren't any issues to work out (like you'd have with all that protesting you do) then the person goes to a standard confession, communes, and after that the parishioner can go about their business like any other person in the parish. I don't think this is considered poaching in the cases this deals with though, but rather is meant to provide support for people who are not close enough to an OO parish to attend, and would otherwise be without a parish, or have some other significant situation that requires this kind of solution. I suppose you could argue whether they are
really converting; "if an OO Church opens up a year later and they leave to attend that new parish, did they ever really convert?" But I think that's mostly just semantics, and the term loses its usefulness in such situations.