Deacon Lance said:
Alpha60 said:
jobin219 said:
Salpy said:
The Remembrance of the Prophet Jonah is during the Fast of the Catechumens.
http://www.wdacna.com/feasts-sacraments
(Click on February.)
Where I am, many people (particularly women) do fast at this time, but it's for St. Sarkis. There are folk traditions connected to the practice of fasting for St. Sarkis, so the Prophet Jonah kind of gets forgotten in all this.
Are there any historical references to the tradition that this fast in the Armenian Church is from the time of St. Gregory the Illuminator?
I would doubt this, because I think this fast emerged among Jews in Mesopotamia in the Nineveh Plains area of modern day Iraq, which is the epicenter of Syriac Christianity since the depopulation of Tur Abdin in Turkey, who were evangelized by St. Thomas the Apostle, and who formed the backbone of the Syriac Orthodox Maphrianate and the Assyrian Church of the East. The other Oriental Orthodox churches I believe picked up the fast because of the prestige of Syriac Orthodox theologians and liturgists in the sixth century, like St. Jacob Barradaeus, who consecrated a veritable army of bishops, St. Severus of Antioch, who defeated St. Justinian in a polemical war and whose theopaschite theology as reflected in the hymn Ho Monogenes ultimately triumphed in all Orthodox churches over Justinian’s minor heresy of apthartodocetism, St. Jacob of Sarugh, the “Flute of the Spirit” whose work complemented that of St. Ephrem, and others.
What we know for sure is that the fast in its present form was imposed by St. Marutha of Tikrit, the serving Maphrian (historically, the vice-Patriarch of the Syriac Orthodox Church charged with supervising the Mesopotamian and Persian sectors, where the church overlapped with the Assyrian Church of the East, and whose position was created to replace the Catholicos of the East after the Nestorian-influenced rupture), in 649. Presumably it then flowed into the other churches, but I expect some antecedent to the present form of the fast existed.
It was Julian of Halicarnassus who authored aphthartodocetism. Also Theopaschite theology was championed by the Scythian monks who were supported by Justinian and saw their formula adopted by the Second Council of Constantinople of which canon 10 reads: "If anyone does not confess that our Lord Jesus Christ who was crucified in flesh is true God and Lord of glory and one of the holy Trinity, let him be anathema".
That may be correct, but it does not address the fact that Justinian
endorsed an edict intended to promulgate apathartodocetism. Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=NjVaCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq=justinian+apthartodocetism&source=bl&ots=_uSmtERIAf&sig=ACfU3U1pvuAX-qyG5vD23bI0k4hqjtHwKQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAg-KtyLzgAhU4IjQIHVwYBL0Q6AEwDXoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=justinian%20apthartodocetism&f=false
St. Justinian clearly vacillated on this issue, because he was a key driving force behind the addition of the hymn Ho Monogenes to the Eastern Orthodox liturgy, a hymn which originated in Oriental Orthodoxy most likely in the Syriac church under St. Severus, but which some of us also attribute variously to St. Cyril or St. Athanasius. I think the attribution to St. Severus is correct because this hymn is used to open the Qurbono Qadisho. Ho Monogenes is very nearly the sine qua non of Christological Orthodoxy; my view is that whoever confesses it cannot be a Nestorian or a Eutychian. It also repaired Chalcedonian Christianity. The Assyrians do not use it as far as I am aware, but your church determined their Christology was acceptable and I accept that determination. Ordinarily however, I want to see the Ho Monogenes, and I daresay the Christological heresies of Calvinism would have been less likely if Pope Gregory I had put it in the Roman mass as one of the main hymns.
Actually the inclusion of Ho Monogenes in the EO liturgy under St. Justinian is the main reason I regard him as a saint, possibly the only reason. I suspect his Oriental Orthodox wife St. Theodora had a major positive influence on him, and depending on the health of their relationship, Orthodoxy flowed into St. Justinian through her blessed lips. Would that I could have a wife like St. Theodora!
At any rate, Severian is the “lost saint” of Eastern Orthodoxy. I dispute, for technical reasons, the anathemas against Diodore of Tarsus, and most especially Origen Adamantius and Theodore of Mopsuestia, because they died in the peace of the church, and I think it is wrong to anathematize someone post-mortem. Origen and Mar Theorore made huge contributions to Orthodox theology. And Origen’s error of the transmigration of souls was also made by St. Gregory of Nyssa, and worse, by St. Isaac the Syrian, who was glorified universally despite being a member of the Church of the East (some Greeks who hate Assyrians have tried to argue there were two Isaacs and Sebastian Brock is confusing them, but the quality of Professor Brock’s scholarship is unimpeachable in the face of blind fanatacism).
However, it was St. Severus who made a gigantic contribution; modern EO and OO Christology is by and large the fruit of his careful and consistent theology and Christology. St. Severus should have EO cathedrals named after him and be remembered in the same breath as Sts. Cyril, Athanasius, Basil, and Gregory Nazianzus. Rome should hail him as a Doctor of the Church; he is much more worthy of that title than many people Rome granted it to. His influence permeates our understanding of the union of humanity and divinity in the person of Jesus Christ, a union without confusion, change or separation; his writings are a glorious summary of the doctrine of the Incarnation of God as exposited by Sts. Athanasius and Cyril.
And the best contemporary treatise on Christology, indeed probably the only one worth reading, was written by our own Father Peter. Being a mod, he obviously can’t promote his book here, but in my opinion every OCNetter interested in Christology, the Oriental churches, the controversies of the fourth through eighth centuries concerning our Lord, and related issues, should have a copy. And you can get it as ab ebook on Amazon and iBooks. It is a monumentoud achievement, and if Father Peter reposed tomorrow, which I really hope does not happen (rather, many years to you, Father, and axios!), also many years and axios to you, Fr. Deacon Lance; the book alone would be sufficient cause for Father Peter to be glorified ecumenically after the manner of St. Isaac.