Gay marriage could signal return to ‘centuries of persecution’, say RCC priests

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
But now  on a bit more serious mode: google Monk Gleb Podmoshenski.
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
But now  on a bit more serious mode: google Monk Gleb Podmoshenski.
I did and Google listed 4 of your posts on this forum.

It must be the spelling. I wouldn't trust the internet to be that slander-free when it comes to an Orthodox monk.  ::)
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
How Fr. Seraphim (Eugen) Rose and Monk Gleb met if you read the account sounds much like a little romance. Or should I say bromance lol

Correct titles inserted by moderator.
 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
How eugen rose and Gleb met if you read the account sounds much like a little romance. Or should I say bromance lol
You can say anything you wish, but until you have some substance to back it up, it means nothing.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
As I see it the right wingers fascination with fr.Seraphim Rose is only due to his ultra reactionary views, as if in an effort to somehow psychologically compensate for an identy that in any of those much fetishized traditional/conservative/organic communities/societies /ordos would have had no place  but would have been just scorned. Now I am pretty sure he wouldn't have the same following had he been somehow more attuned to the aspirations of his age that even if naive sometimes were still less intent in making life hell for marginal categories of people. His case is tragic IMO
 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
How Fr. Seraphim (Eugen) Rose and Monk met if you read the account sounds much like a little romance. Or should I say bromance lol
Are we into using first names for clergy now?  I suppose this is nothing compared to the utter disrespect you have paid for Fr. Seraphim Rose.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Those are their secular names so no problem there if you imply I broke the rules of this forum. As for disrespect that's more in the eye of the beholder.

You are put on warning status for 30 days for violating the rules on using titles for clergy and another 30 days for disrespecting the rules publicly. If you wish to contest this action, please PM me first before going up the chain. Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
As I see it the right wingers
This is your first problem.  Your second problem is ignoring, after being advised several times, this is not a political forum.  I have asked nicely, now I am asking not so nicely.  Keep your political garbage in the political forum.
augustin717 said:
fascination with fr.Seraphim Rose is only due to his ultra reactionary views
I know of no one who is fascinated with him, and I know very little about him.  He is certainly interesting enough to study and learn more.  Perhaps you should do the same.

augustin717 said:
as if in an effort to somehow psychologically compensate for an identy that in any of those much fetishized traditional/conservative/organic communities/societies /ordos would have had no place  but would have been just scorned.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
augustin717 said:
Now I am pretty sure he wouldn't have the same following had he been somehow more attuned to the aspirations of his age that even if naive sometimes were still less intent in making life hell for marginal categories of people. His case is tragic IMO
How can you be so sure?  What aspirations of his age?  Attuned in what way?  Life isn’t hell, but hell is.  How is a man who turns his life over to God and lives as  monk, becoming an inspiration to a lot of people, tragic?

 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
Those are their secular names so no problem there if you imply I broke the rules of this forum. As for disrespect that's more in the eye of the beholder.
I guess we will have to see what the moderator says.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Kerdy alas you aren't the brightest bulb around here. I would also appreciate if you didn't feel compelled to correct all I say.
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
As I see it the right wingers fascination with fr.Seraphim Rose is only due to his ultra reactionary views, as if in an effort to somehow psychologically compensate for an identy that in any of those much fetishized traditional/conservative/organic communities/societies /ordos would have had no place  but would have been just scorned. Now I am pretty sure he wouldn't have the same following had he been somehow more attuned to the aspirations of his age that even if naive sometimes were still less intent in making life hell for marginal categories of people. His case is tragic IMO
Would all of his views be "ultra reactionary" or just some of them?

Doesn't being "ultra" push one into the "non-reactionary" sphere by any chance? Doesn't the "progressive/reactionary" dilemma admit any transcendence whatsoever?

You mean, had he lived in Transylvania, our sane people - the ever straight standard of Orthodoxy - would have scorned him for making prostrations and having too long a beard?

Fr. Arsenie Boca - roughly his contemporary - was and still is quite popular in Transylvania and IMO he wasn't much different. Of course, he was punished for being "reactionary". That made his case less tragic.
 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
Kerdy alas you aren't the brightest bulb around here. I would also appreciate if you didn't feel compelled to correct all I say.
Personal attacks?  Congratulations for your advancement up the chain.  I sure your “fans” will be proud.  However, since this is all you can muster, because you obviously are unable to carry on an intellectual conversation without name calling or some long spiral into the decent of political insanity, I feel you are not a person worthy of dialogue and bid you good day.
 

ialmisry

Strategos
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
41,795
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Chicago
augustin717 said:
For a variety of reasons, I'd have to see some substantiation of your claim.
Then, I'm afraid, you'll have to go to the villages strewn along the valley of the White Cris (Crisul Alb) and conduct investigations on the ground. I know that area pretty well.
you also are lugging around a heavy agenda, that I know pretty well.

That's in Arad, no?  IIRC, I know a number of people from there.  I'll have to ask them about their recollections of the place, if it matches with yours.
 

mike

Protostrator
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
24,873
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
30
Location
Białystok / Warsaw
Kerdy said:
Michał Kalina said:
LizaSymonenko said:
Michał Kalina said:
primuspilus said:
Michał Kalina said:
Kerdy said:
Michał Kalina said:
stavros_388 said:
All of this is in fact fruitless because I believe that both you and the Church are mistaken about homosexuality. As far as I'm concerned, it's as sinful as being red-headed or having a heart murmur.

So go ahead and respond if you wish, but since we appear to disagree at a very fundamental level, I doubt it will serve much of a purpose.
The Church does not say homosexuality is sinful.
I wouldn't be so fast to make this proclamation.  Look at Father Seraphim Rose, who once lived as a homosexual, but turned away from that life.
Did he become heterosexual? Really?
Dont really know, but he turned away from it. Im not sure if he "switched sides".
Turned away? How did he manage to nullify his libido? Did he take bromine?
Are you saying that people are incapable of living celibate lives?
I'm saying that most* people are incapable of turning off their libido.
This is not entirely true, but even if it was, it has NOTHING to do with what we were talking about...nothing.
It has. You wrote Fr. Rose had stopped being homosexual. I think it'd have been nearly impossible and I do not believe you.
 

Asteriktos

Hypatos
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
39,263
Reaction score
108
Points
63
Age
41
I do not think "turned away from that life" equates to "stopped being homosexual," if the first phrase speaks of actions and the second one orientation...
 

Kerdy

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
5,813
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Michał Kalina said:
Kerdy said:
Michał Kalina said:
LizaSymonenko said:
Michał Kalina said:
primuspilus said:
Michał Kalina said:
Kerdy said:
Michał Kalina said:
stavros_388 said:
All of this is in fact fruitless because I believe that both you and the Church are mistaken about homosexuality. As far as I'm concerned, it's as sinful as being red-headed or having a heart murmur.

So go ahead and respond if you wish, but since we appear to disagree at a very fundamental level, I doubt it will serve much of a purpose.
The Church does not say homosexuality is sinful.
I wouldn't be so fast to make this proclamation.  Look at Father Seraphim Rose, who once lived as a homosexual, but turned away from that life.
Did he become heterosexual? Really?
Dont really know, but he turned away from it. Im not sure if he "switched sides".
Turned away? How did he manage to nullify his libido? Did he take bromine?
Are you saying that people are incapable of living celibate lives?
I'm saying that most* people are incapable of turning off their libido.
This is not entirely true, but even if it was, it has NOTHING to do with what we were talking about...nothing.
It has. You wrote Fr. Rose had stopped being homosexual. I think it'd have been nearly impossible and I do not believe you.
That is not at all what I said.  There is no need for such dishonesty.
 

stavros_388

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Canada
To be honest, I had not heard any of this scandalous news regarding Fr. Herman before this. It's a bit saddening.  :(

Fwiw, I just found this site which presents a defense of Fr. Seraphim Rose of Blessed Memory:

http://startingontheroyalpath.blogspot.ca/1999/02/in-fr-seraphims-defense.html
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
stavros_388 said:
To be honest, I had not heard any of this scandalous news regarding Fr. Herman before this. It's a bit saddening.  :(

Fwiw, I just found this site which presents a defense of Fr. Seraphim Rose of Blessed Memory:

http://startingontheroyalpath.blogspot.ca/1999/02/in-fr-seraphims-defense.html
After reading this, I understand why Fr. Seraphim would have wanted to share a cell with Herman.

I'm sure he wouldn't have agreed to it, if he hadn't been certain that, by the grace of God, he himself had overcome temptation.

Romans 15:1 Now we who are strong ought to bear the weaknesses of those without strength and not please ourselves.

Galatians 6:2 Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.

From the Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 22 - How the Monks Are to Sleep:

Let the brethren sleep singly, each in a separate bed. Let them receive the bedding befitting their mode of life, according to the direction of their Abbot. If it can be done, let all sleep in one apartment; but if the number doth not allow it, let them sleep in tens or twenties with the seniors who have charge of them. Let a light be kept burning constantly in the cell till morning.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
stavros_388 said:
To be honest, I had not heard any of this scandalous news regarding Fr. Herman before this. It's a bit saddening.  :(

Fwiw, I just found this site which presents a defense of Fr. Seraphim Rose of Blessed Memory:

http://startingontheroyalpath.blogspot.ca/1999/02/in-fr-seraphims-defense.html
I love the comment from "Joanna". Truly rich. More like the proverbial ostrich's tactics. But it's of no importance of course what Fr. Seraphim actually fell into or not. That's for God to judge if He cares. The mindset of his great admirers is what I find funny as they only admire fr. Rose for doing in a way, what their project is for homosexuals and other undesired people. Bury the issues/pretend it doesn't exist. Also preach a political worldview-in the largest sense of the word- of the most retrograde sort. like his idealization of a world he never knew personally. Autocratic Russia. Had he been a bit more open-even to the level of fr. Nouwen, I doubt he would have the same set of admirers and defenders.
&&&&&&&

"From: Joanna

I remember reading somewhere somebody who knew Fr. Seraphim said that when he was told about some sexual sin, he would say, "That's disgusting" and change the subject.

I've seen where a few have suggested that Fr. Seraphim "struggled" with the homo passion.  Eugene was also a cigarette-smoking heavy-drinking gourmandizer.  Did Fr. Seraphim "struggle" with these passions?  There's no evidence.  All evidence points to that he simply abandoned them.  Homos should follow his example.  Change the subject.

The niece, Cathy Scott, wrote her book immediately after Not of This World was published.  It was suggested that maybe she was trying to get a free ride on the coat-tails of Not of This World.  Out of respect for Fr. Seraphim, I refused to read the book. I don't care if she was a family member: non-Orthodox can not understand an Orthodox soul.  Neither can anyone comprehend the dying that occurs in Orthodox Baptism unless they have experienced it.

You and I know Fr. Seraphim infinitely better than Miss Scott could even imagine.

From where do we think Miss Scott got the idea to write that book?  Judging from all the Orthodox evolutionists who don't want to believe about the toll houses, who use Fr. Seraphim's dead past as an excuse to reject living Patristic teachings; I can well guess from where the idea comes..."
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
I love the comment from "Joanna". Truly rich. More like the proverbial ostrich's tactics. But it's of no importance of course what Fr. Seraphim actually fell into or not. That's for God to judge if He cares. The mindset of his great admirers is what I find funny as they only admire fr. Rose for doing in a way, what their project is for homosexuals and other undesired people. Bury the issues/pretend it doesn't exist. Also preach a political worldview-in the largest sense of the word- of the most retrograde sort. like his idealization of a world he never knew personally. Autocratic Russia. Had he been a bit more open-even to the level of fr. Nouwen, I doubt he would have the same set of admirers and defenders.
You let your politics contaminate (infect) your religion too much. How about trying the opposite, for a change?

Of course God cares about what we do. Of course he will judge. 

What's Autocratic Russia got to do with all this?

You seem to have everybody all figured out. Your political theories explain people without a rest.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
^ too much like your bible verses. You really think they explain everything?
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
^ too much like your bible verses. You really think they explain everything?
They explain religious people better than political theories.

And yes, I believe that Scripture is divinely inspired and therefore try to understand everything through its frame of reference. It mustn't be given a narrow interpretation, but it needn't be confined or restricted to a narrow portion of one's existence either. In fact, there's nothing Scripture can't or shouldn't be applied to. Which is more than anyone can say or hope about Marx.
 

augustin717

Taxiarches
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Romaios said:
augustin717 said:
^ too much like your bible verses. You really think they explain everything?
They explain religious people better than political theories.

And yes, I believe that Scripture is divinely inspired and therefore try to understand everything through its frame of reference. It mustn't be given a narrow interpretation, but it needn't be confined or restricted to a narrow portion of one's existence either. There's nothing Scripture can't or shouldn't be applied to. Which is more than anyone can say or hope about Marx.
You're funny Romeo. You think I take Marx as divinely inspired. Let's drop it.
 

Romaios

Archon
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Points
0
augustin717 said:
You're funny Romeo. You think I take Marx as divinely inspired. Let's drop it.
Well, I don't mind amusing you.

Even if you don't care to admit it, he has become your frame of reference for the world.
 
Top