- Joined
- Jun 18, 2017
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 8
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Faith
- Sunni Muslim
- Jurisdiction
- strict Hanafi
Strict Plotinian divine simplicity makes identity claims 1) The Father is identical to the Divine Essence 2) The Son is identical to the Divine Essence 3) Therefore, the Son is identical to the Father, but Latin dogma states that the Father and Son are not identical. Even if a subject knows an object, then there are three distinctions here, the knower, the knowing and the known. How are the three persons of the Trinity distinct? Is the distinction a rational one? If so, then the distinction is just in the mind of the believer, and thus you have modalism. Is the distinction a real one, if that is the case, then the substances exist independent and separable of each other, and you would have polytheism.
The Thomists agree that Social Trinitarianism can not be true because it would mean that God has parts,so they have developed Latin Trinitarianism wich is basically FSH Modalism.this still isn't Congruent with Plotinus' Divine Simplicity but is a weaker version of Divine Simplicity wich isn't even technically divine simplicity.
I believe that absolute Divine Simplicity can be logically proven wich is why I am not a Trinitarian.
The Thomists agree that Social Trinitarianism can not be true because it would mean that God has parts,so they have developed Latin Trinitarianism wich is basically FSH Modalism.this still isn't Congruent with Plotinus' Divine Simplicity but is a weaker version of Divine Simplicity wich isn't even technically divine simplicity.
I believe that absolute Divine Simplicity can be logically proven wich is why I am not a Trinitarian.