The ability to be tempted is not sin, and neither does the ability to use of free will to resist temptation mean one has a sinful nature. Heck, even concupiscence is not sin (not that Jesus or Mary or Adam and Eve [when first created] had concupiscence). I think you're grasping at straws. Your "lack of free will" argument against the IC really is full of holes.
Irish Hermit said:You are being quarrelsome and that is causing you to forget basic theology.Mardukm said:These are not red herrings. This goes to the very heart of the topic. It was you who claimed that lack of concupisence means a person loses the "enjoyment" of the full use of one's free will. So this either means that Jesus was NOT fully human and could not relate to us fully,
Jesus Christ was like us in all things *except* sin.