Why?isaelie said:Is an Orthodox 'layman' allowed to make a vow to the Lord, and to have long hair?
Growing the hair of the head but not of the face seems somewhat strange.isaelie said:BTW, i myself want to do it, but am awaiting an answer, and I am an ordinary man. And if I do it, is the beard required with it?
Is it "allowed"? Of course. The Church isn't in the business of regulating your fashion choices.isaelie said:Is an Orthodox 'layman' allowed to make a vow to the Lord, and to have long hair?
LOL! that was hilarious akimori. and yeah dude if you are gonna be like that then at the very least include a goatee too and avoid anyone by the name Delilah. ;Dakimori makoto said:Growing the hair of the head but not of the face seems somewhat strange.isaelie said:BTW, i myself want to do it, but am awaiting an answer, and I am an ordinary man. And if I do it, is the beard required with it?
Growing long hair and a beard is not against some code of lay behavior.isaelie said:ok not allowed, is it... frowned upon? Is it .... you know... theologically correct.. that sorta thing
Nice.isaelie said:The vow is none of your business
Guess my answer wasn't clear enough:isaelie said:How strong the urge to make jokes and what not.
I myself have a beard and am going to leave it, my question about the beard was if you like, investigating the situation.
The vow is none of your business
@orthodoxnorm
The question is can an Orthodox layman have long hair because of a vow, or are only priests and monk supported to do it.
@ NicholasMyra It is not to recreate a religious order, it is the same reason the monks or priests do it, because of a vow
It's not really a theological matter. However, the canons do in fact state that lay hair styles should be different from clerical and monastic ones; and also that a lay person should not assume the appearance of a priest or monk.isaelie said:ok not allowed, is it... frowned upon? Is it .... you know... theologically correct.. that sorta thing
Typical Russians.Benjamin the Red said:From what I understand of Orthodoxy in Russia, it's generally only clergy that grow beards and maintain long hair, and seminarians specifically maintain short hair and are clean shaven, lest they come across as presumptuous.
Please never say this again without citing the canon.pensateomnia said:However, the canons do in fact state
What is the Church's view? And besides my concern is not what people think or care about it.orthonorm said:Grow your hair as long as you want. Take whatever vow you want. I don't think anyone is going to care about either. If they care about the length of your hair for what ever reason outside of how nice it looks, they are probably crazy. If they care are about the vow, they are probably rightfully concerned.
But the Church is the people... so if they don't care...isaelie said:What is the Church's view? And besides my concern is not what people think or care about it.
The hair thing can be done, but weird private vows come across as contrary to the Church as communal organism. At least your priest should know about it.isaelie said:Or is it because of another reason?
Or can it be done?
I am not insulted. People call me names in PMs all the time. I find it humorous. You are far from that.isaelie said:What is the Church's view? And besides my concern is not what people think or care about it.orthonorm said:Grow your hair as long as you want. Take whatever vow you want. I don't think anyone is going to care about either. If they care about the length of your hair for what ever reason outside of how nice it looks, they are probably crazy. If they care are about the vow, they are probably rightfully concerned.
So i'll put it very simply, and forgive me orthonorm and guys if i came off as insulting.
Is it not to be done, because you may come off as a priest or monk? Is that the reasoning?
There are several canons about priestly and monastic hair, and not impersonating priests or monks. Trullo 21 is one that mentions hair-related customs, but there are many others, which I'm not going to look up for you. Try reading Chalcedon, Trullo, Nicaea II, Protodeutera 861, Hagia Sophia 879...probably also Neocaesarea, if I recall correctly.NicholasMyra said:Please never say this again without citing the canon.pensateomnia said:However, the canons do in fact state
Which have exactly zero to do with having long hair in-itself. It doesn't require much thought to put that together.pensateomnia said:There are several canons about priestly and monastic hair, and not impersonating priests or monks. Trullo 21 is one that mentions hair-related customs, but there are many others, which I'm not going to look up for you. Try reading Chalcedon, Trullo, Nicaea II, Protodeutera 861, Hagia Sophia 879...probably also Neocaesarea, if I recall correctly.NicholasMyra said:Please never say this again without citing the canon.pensateomnia said:However, the canons do in fact state
Of course, during the centuries in question, monks actually CUT their hair.
I am not big on this diddy, but it seems the most prudent here:isaelie said:Oh ok, sorry about that. I sorta meant it in another way, the 'people' i was referring to did not have genuine concern, but were the ones who would think you a fool or something.
Ok, let us take an example. If a man takes a vow that he will join a monastery if God permits him to live to that time.
Didn't Christ say "let your yes be yes and your no be no, anything else is from the evil one"?isaelie said:Ok, let us take an example. If a man takes a vow that he will join a monastery if God permits him to live to that time.
They certainly do have bearing in the conversation I was having, which was not with you.orthonorm said:I already dealt with the matter of the canons and their purpose and how they have no bearing here.pensateomnia said:There are several canons about priestly and monastic hair, and not impersonating priests or monks. Trullo 21 is one that mentions hair-related customs, but there are many others, which I'm not going to look up for you. Try reading Chalcedon, Trullo, Nicaea II, Protodeutera 861, Hagia Sophia 879...probably also Neocaesarea, if I recall correctly.NicholasMyra said:Please never say this again without citing the canon.pensateomnia said:However, the canons do in fact state
Of course, during the centuries in question, monks actually CUT their hair.
How hard did I want to LARP in those days, and how hilariously silly it is now. Embarrasing.NicholasMyra said:We had a poster who wanted to start wearing medieval western monk garb to church, and while this is not technically forbidden, it was not recommended for similar reasons.
If you take the Patristic consensus on this passage . . .NicholasMyra said:Didn't Christ say "let your yes be yes and your no be no, anything else is from the evil one"?isaelie said:Ok, let us take an example. If a man takes a vow that he will join a monastery if God permits him to live to that time.
I gave you the benefit of Trolling. Good times.Achronos said:How hard did I want to LARP in those days, and how hilariously silly it is now. Embarrasing.NicholasMyra said:We had a poster who wanted to start wearing medieval western monk garb to church, and while this is not technically forbidden, it was not recommended for similar reasons.
You mean you never did that? What a let down... ;DAchronos said:How hard did I want to LARP in those days, and how hilariously silly it is now. Embarrasing.NicholasMyra said:We had a poster who wanted to start wearing medieval western monk garb to church, and while this is not technically forbidden, it was not recommended for similar reasons.
Thanks guys really appreciate the replies. But a reply along the lines of this is goodHiwot said:isaelie, hair style means nothing by itself, however when it is done as avow to God, it starts to mean something, in this case, if you are trying to consecrate yourself to God in a vow( I do not care to know the condition of the vow nor was that my intention in the first place) the church has canons for consecration of people in service to God and the Church. doing it by yourself is spiritually very harmful to put it mildly, therefore if you are considering a consecration of self to God then do it under obedience to your spiritual father and to the Church. doing it solo be it via hair growing or cutting of self is a trap of the evil one spiritually speaking .. that's all I am going to say. you do not have to listen to me at all. just putting my two cents.
You could not take better advice. Glad you found what you were looking for.isaelie said:Thanks guys really appreciate the replies. But a reply along the lines of this is goodHiwot said:isaelie, hair style means nothing by itself, however when it is done as avow to God, it starts to mean something, in this case, if you are trying to consecrate yourself to God in a vow( I do not care to know the condition of the vow nor was that my intention in the first place) the church has canons for consecration of people in service to God and the Church. doing it by yourself is spiritually very harmful to put it mildly, therefore if you are considering a consecration of self to God then do it under obedience to your spiritual father and to the Church. doing it solo be it via hair growing or cutting of self is a trap of the evil one spiritually speaking .. that's all I am going to say. you do not have to listen to me at all. just putting my two cents.
What does a monk vow look like in the EO?isaelie said:But Nicholas why do monks take vows? Isn't their yes yes and no no