• Please remember: Pray for Ukraine in the Prayer forum; Share news in the Christian News section; Discuss religious implications in FFA: Religious Topics; Discuss political implications in Politics (and if you don't have access, PM me) Thank you! + Fr. George, Forum Administrator

Looks like ROCOR will dismantle its WR

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,430
Reaction score
315
Points
83
Age
41
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Faith
Mercenary Freudianism
Jurisdiction
Texas Feminist Coptic
Romaios said:
Mor Ephrem said:
Jesus Christ, the Only-Begotten Son and Immortal Word of God (as St Severus of Antioch wrote of him in his hymn which you sing at every Divine Liturgy)
We attribute the O monogenes to Emperor Justinian.  ;)
You would.  ;)
 

TheTrisagion

Hoplitarches
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
176
Points
63
Age
42
Location
PA, USA
Faith
Orthodox
Jurisdiction
Antiochian
Peacemaker said:
TheTrisagion said:
Peacemaker said:
When they stop being schematics and accept God is both fully God and fully man.
Mor,
I had no idea you were a schematic.
HAHAHA  :D  gotta love auto spell check


also, Jesus Christ is God, so how can Jesus be something that God isn't if they are both the same?
Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,430
Reaction score
315
Points
83
Age
41
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Faith
Mercenary Freudianism
Jurisdiction
Texas Feminist Coptic
TheTrisagion said:
Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.
I'm pretty sure I've seen a schematic for that.  ;)
 

TheTrisagion

Hoplitarches
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
176
Points
63
Age
42
Location
PA, USA
Faith
Orthodox
Jurisdiction
Antiochian
Mor Ephrem said:
TheTrisagion said:
Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.
I'm pretty sure I've seen a schematic for that.  ;)
For you schematically minded individuals...  ;D

 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,430
Reaction score
315
Points
83
Age
41
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Faith
Mercenary Freudianism
Jurisdiction
Texas Feminist Coptic
I tried to imagine how to make such a schematic that would incorporate "Man" along with "ises" and "is nots", in order to help explain that aspect better, and my head started moving along the lines of the tetrahedron I imagined.  My neck hurts. 
 

TheTrisagion

Hoplitarches
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
176
Points
63
Age
42
Location
PA, USA
Faith
Orthodox
Jurisdiction
Antiochian
Mor Ephrem said:
I tried to imagine how to make such a schematic that would incorporate "Man" along with "ises" and "is nots", in order to help explain that aspect better, and my head started moving along the lines of the tetrahedron I imagined.  My neck hurts. 
I think you need a cantellated tesseract for that.

 

TheTrisagion

Hoplitarches
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
176
Points
63
Age
42
Location
PA, USA
Faith
Orthodox
Jurisdiction
Antiochian
Mor Ephrem said:
My mind is blown.  Thank you. 
But it should be so obvious now.  I think that it brings so much clarity to the subject.  :laugh:
 

Peacemaker

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Yes this makes since, I should have said Jesus instead of God. Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church. With that said, not liking the western rite is one thing, but being a non Orthodox, thanks for the offer but not in this life time.  #Rant

At any rate, back on topic
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,430
Reaction score
315
Points
83
Age
41
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Faith
Mercenary Freudianism
Jurisdiction
Texas Feminist Coptic
Peacemaker said:
Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.
Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak   

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues. 

 

TheTrisagion

Hoplitarches
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
176
Points
63
Age
42
Location
PA, USA
Faith
Orthodox
Jurisdiction
Antiochian
But how boring the world would be if we did not have ideologues to tell us how wrong everyone else is!  ;)
 

Peacemaker

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Mor Ephrem said:
Peacemaker said:
Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.
Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak   

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues. 
The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.
 

mike

Protostrator
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
24,873
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
31
Location
Białystok / Warsaw
Faith
Christian
Jurisdiction
Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk
Yawn. Go to Private Fora and play with yourselves there.
 

mike

Protostrator
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
24,873
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
31
Location
Białystok / Warsaw
Faith
Christian
Jurisdiction
Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk
Mor Ephrem said:
Michał Kalina said:
Yawn. Go to Private Fora and play with yourselves there.
English not your first language, or are you speaking from personal expertise?  :p
Pun intended. Do you really need to troll some hyperdox newbie? It's not even funny and he does not realise you are trolling him.
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,430
Reaction score
315
Points
83
Age
41
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Faith
Mercenary Freudianism
Jurisdiction
Texas Feminist Coptic
I don't need to, no.  You don't need to post half the stuff you post either.  But "need" hasn't been a meaningful category in internet discussion forum posting ever, so what's the problem?  "It's my constitutional right!"     

And I wasn't being funny. 
 

Salpy

Hoplitarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,501
Reaction score
18
Points
38
Let's get back on topic, and if people want to further debate Chalcedon and all its schematics, that would best take place in the private forum.  :)
 

FatherHLL

Archon
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Faith
Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction
Nea Roma
Peacemaker said:
Mor Ephrem said:
Peacemaker said:
Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.
Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  
The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.
Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.  So ROCOR's parishes of various rites all agree with the Ecumenical Councils.  You agree with this, yes?
 

Agabus

Taxiarches
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
19
Points
38
Faith
Magnificat
Jurisdiction
La Virgen de Caridad del Cobre
Father H said:
Peacemaker said:
Mor Ephrem said:
Peacemaker said:
Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.
Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  
The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.
Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.
Considering that the Peacemaker was one of the most popular guns in history, perhaps it is quite apt.
 

Peacemaker

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Father H said:
Peacemaker said:
Mor Ephrem said:
Peacemaker said:
Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.
Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  
The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.
Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.  So ROCOR's parishes of various rites all agree with the Ecumenical Councils.  You agree with this, yes?
Salpy said:
Let's get back on topic
 

IS

High Elder
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
563
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
15
Location
Queensland
Kerdy said:
Didymus said:
This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.
Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
 

Aristobolus

Member
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Faith
Orthodox Christian
If by "experienced" you mean retired, but willing to assist with a small parish, that is a great situation.  But any experienced Priests with children or nearing retirement cannot subsist on what most small missions pay them. 
 

ilyazhito

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
44
Points
48
Age
28
Location
Bethesda,MD
Didymus said:
Kerdy said:
Didymus said:
This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.
Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
Either that, or have one priest and one deacon. If the deacon could be ordained a priest eventually, the priest would train him on the job. If not, the permanent deacon would then be the priest's assistant. With a priest, deacon, and subdeacon available at each parish, there would be fewer problems of succession, but even the readers and subdeacons would have to be vetted, to ensure that they would be able to succeed the priest and deacon if and when needed.
 

podkarpatska

Merarches
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
9,732
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Northeast United States
Website
www.acrod.org
ilyazhito said:
Didymus said:
Kerdy said:
Didymus said:
This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.
Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
Either that, or have one priest and one deacon. If the deacon could be ordained a priest eventually, the priest would train him on the job. If not, the permanent deacon would then be the priest's assistant. With a priest, deacon, and subdeacon available at each parish, there would be fewer problems of succession, but even the readers and subdeacons would have to be vetted, to ensure that they would be able to succeed the priest and deacon if and when needed.
You have to trust your bishop' s discernment. I know plenty of experienced priests and deacons who shouldn't be within a mile of a neophyte!
 
Top