• For users new and old: the forum rules were streamlined when we transitioned to the new software. Please ensure that you are familiar with them. Continued use of the forum means that you (a) know the rules, and (b) pledge that you'll abide by them. For more information, check out the OrthodoxChristianity.Net Rules section. (There are only 2 threads there - Rules, and Administrative Structure.)

Ordinary Form of the Catholic Mass, Roman Missal-A critical discussion

J Michael

Cave Dweller
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
11,730
Reaction score
31
Points
48
Location
People's Republic of Maryland
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
 

Cavaradossi

Archon
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
2,036
Reaction score
3
Points
38
J Michael said:
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
I'm interested in seeing why some people object to it so vehemently. If it were done with no liturgical abuses, what exactly is wrong with the OF? And on the other hand, I'm interested in knowing if there are any things which people consider improvements of the OF over the EF. I fear we may not have enough Catholic posters here for such a discussion, however, and this very topic is banned at CAF, so perhaps I am SOL.  :-\
 

Papist

Toumarches
Joined
Aug 24, 2006
Messages
13,771
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
40
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Cavaradossi said:
J Michael said:
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
I'm interested in seeing why some people object to it so vehemently. If it were done with no liturgical abuses, what exactly is wrong with the OF? And on the other hand, I'm interested in knowing if there are any things which people consider improvements of the OF over the EF. I fear we may not have enough Catholic posters here for such a discussion, however, and this very topic is banned at CAF, so perhaps I am SOL.  :-\
Well, personally I have no problem with the OF, as long as it is celebrated reverently, facing liturgical east, and with sacred music.
 

dzheremi

Protokentarchos
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
4,417
Reaction score
3
Points
0
I never experienced an EF mass, since the city I lived in at the time didn't offer the EF (and then only once a month) until about a month before I moved away. From what I have heard from people who prefer the OF is that the EF is somewhat cold and/or stuffy. Again, I have no opinion, as I never experienced one. I experienced a few less-than-by-the-book OFs, though (jazz bands doing patriotic songs during the Mass because it's 4th of July? Check!). I don't mean to put words in any RCs mouths, but I'd guess that this is often one of those "general atmosphere" things, with the idea that the OF as often celebrated is either too irreverent, or (according to some of the more extreme anti-OF crowd) actually generates/encourages such irreverence by its form.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
3,125
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Sydney, Australia
dzheremi said:
I never experienced an EF mass, since the city I lived in at the time didn't offer the EF (and then only once a month) until about a month before I moved away. From what I have heard from people who prefer the OF is that the EF is somewhat cold and/or stuffy. Again, I have no opinion, as I never experienced one. I experienced a few less-than-by-the-book OFs, though (jazz bands doing patriotic songs during the Mass because it's 4th of July? Check!). I don't mean to put words in any RCs mouths, but I'd guess that this is often one of those "general atmosphere" things, with the idea that the OF as often celebrated is either too irreverent, or (according to some of the more extreme anti-OF crowd) actually generates/encourages such irreverence by its form.
As I understand it, the eucharistic prayer is entirely silent in the so-called extraordinary form. That would drive me a bit mental.
 

Wyatt

Archon
Joined
Jun 26, 2008
Messages
2,467
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
33
Location
Illinois, US
Cavaradossi said:
J Michael said:
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
I'm interested in seeing why some people object to it so vehemently. If it were done with no liturgical abuses, what exactly is wrong with the OF? And on the other hand, I'm interested in knowing if there are any things which people consider improvements of the OF over the EF. I fear we may not have enough Catholic posters here for such a discussion, however, and this very topic is banned at CAF, so perhaps I am SOL.  :-\
Well...for one thing the Scripture readings have been redone in the OF, making it to where the Catholic faithful read much more of the Bible during Mass over a three year cycle than they ever did in the Tridentine (EF) Mass.
 

PJ

Taxiarches
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
6,495
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
New England
Cavaradossi said:
J Michael said:
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
I'm interested in seeing why some people object to it so vehemently. If it were done with no liturgical abuses, what exactly is wrong with the OF? And on the other hand, I'm interested in knowing if there are any things which people consider improvements of the OF over the EF. I fear we may not have enough Catholic posters here for such a discussion, however, and this very topic is banned at CAF, so perhaps I am SOL.  :-\
That's a good question. Most often, objections have to do with versus populi, communion in the hand, etc. – that is to say, things that are permitted in the OF but not required.

Or translation issues, e.g. "pro multis" as "for all", which until recently was the English translation. But it could be pointed out that the language options for the OF have always been Latin or vernacular ... so again it's essentially an option-complaint.

Part of me wants to start a thread on fisheaters -- less than 1/2, maybe 1/4.
 

J Michael

Cave Dweller
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
11,730
Reaction score
31
Points
48
Location
People's Republic of Maryland
Cavaradossi said:
J Michael said:
In another thread, Cavaradossi wrote: "It would be nice to have a critical discussion on the OF as it was actually intended to be (that is, what is in the rubrics) rather than the abuses that certain people commit."

Here's your chance  ;).  What would you like to discuss?
I'm interested in seeing why some people object to it so vehemently. If it were done with no liturgical abuses, what exactly is wrong with the OF? And on the other hand, I'm interested in knowing if there are any things which people consider improvements of the OF over the EF. I fear we may not have enough Catholic posters here for such a discussion, however, and this very topic is banned at CAF, so perhaps I am SOL.  :-\
While I *prefer* the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, I have no objections whatsoever to the "OF" of the "N.O."  Where we worship it is celebrated "by the book" and reverently.  No problems.

I've never been to a Mass with the Extraordinary Form so I can't comment on it.
 

Deacon Lance

Protokentarchos
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
37
Points
48
Age
48
Location
Washington, PA
akimori makoto said:
No epiklesis?
It is the OF Mass that has new Eucharistic Prayers with explicit descending epiklesis added.  The Roman Canon in both forms also has an epiklesis, just not the in the form Byzantines are used to.
 
Top