• For users new and old: the forum rules were streamlined when we transitioned to the new software. Please ensure that you are familiar with them. Continued use of the forum means that you (a) know the rules, and (b) pledge that you'll abide by them. For more information, check out the OrthodoxChristianity.Net Rules section. (There are only 2 threads there - Rules, and Administrative Structure.)

ROCOR Western Rite dead? It appears so...

Sleeper

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
U.S.
A sad day if this is true:

http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130712_ensynodmeeting.html
 

WPM

Taxiarches
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
7,775
Reaction score
11
Points
0
Age
38
It still exists in the Antiochian Archdiocese.
 

Shanghaiski

Merarches
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
8,025
Reaction score
27
Points
48
Age
42
Location
Wisconsin, USA
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
 

Sleeper

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
U.S.
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
 

Maria

Toumarches
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
14,023
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
Website
www.euphrosynoscafe.com
Sleeper said:
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
It has been a long overdo house cleaning. Bishop Jerome really needed to be put in his place.
 

ilyazhito

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
5
Points
38
Age
26
Location
Bethesda,MD
What did Bishop Jerome do that angered the Synod? I heard that he might have ordained hastily, but what exactly was his fault?
 

Sleeper

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
U.S.
ilyazhito said:
What did Bishop Jerome do that angered the Synod? I heard that he might have ordained hastily, but what exactly was his fault?
He violated church canons by ordaining several men during a single liturgy. That, to my knowledge, was the largest issue. The over-eagerness to ordain so many priests without existing parishes seems to be another.
 

Santagranddad

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Sleeper said:
ilyazhito said:
What did Bishop Jerome do that angered the Synod? I heard that he might have ordained hastily, but what exactly was his fault?
He violated church canons by ordaining several men during a single liturgy. That, to my knowledge, was the largest issue. The over-eagerness to ordain so many priests without existing parishes seems to be another.
In the Orthodox Church only one person at a time is ordained to a priestly rank. Bishop Jerome knew this and disregarded it. What else did he disregard and why?
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,315
Reaction score
192
Points
63
Age
39
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Sleeper said:
He violated church canons by ordaining several men during a single liturgy. That, to my knowledge, was the largest issue.
AFAIK, the only tradition that has such a canon is the Byzantine tradition, and it's a later canon.  Every other tradition routinely and for centuries has ordained multiple men to the same rank in the same Liturgy.  Should Bp Jerome be held responsible for violating a canon that ostensibly doesn't apply to the WR? 

And if so, why not the Antiochians?  Not that it is ROCOR's responsibility to be an enforcer for anyone but themselves, but the Antiochians have performed such ordinations (Byzantine tradition) with no incident.     

 

biro

Protostrator
Site Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
23,510
Reaction score
160
Points
63
Age
47
Website
archiveofourown.org
I didn't know it wasn't allowed to ordain more than one person at once. Hmmm.
 

arimethea

Archon
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
2,966
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
45
Location
United State of America
Sleeper said:
ilyazhito said:
What did Bishop Jerome do that angered the Synod? I heard that he might have ordained hastily, but what exactly was his fault?
He violated church canons by ordaining several men during a single liturgy. That, to my knowledge, was the largest issue. The over-eagerness to ordain so many priests without existing parishes seems to be another.
Can you please cite the canon(s) he violated by ordaining multiple people to the same order in the same liturgy?
 

FatherHLL

Archon
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Mor Ephrem said:
Sleeper said:
He violated church canons by ordaining several men during a single liturgy. That, to my knowledge, was the largest issue.
AFAIK, the only tradition that has such a canon is the Byzantine tradition, and it's a later canon.  Every other tradition routinely and for centuries has ordained multiple men to the same rank in the same Liturgy.  Should Bp Jerome be held responsible for violating a canon that ostensibly doesn't apply to the WR? 

And if so, why not the Antiochians?  Not that it is ROCOR's responsibility to be an enforcer for anyone but themselves, but the Antiochians have performed such ordinations (Byzantine tradition) with no incident.     
There is no canon forbidding it.  However, most local ordinances do prescribe one of each rank per day per bishop.  ROCOR's local ordinances forbid it, and Bishop Jerome transgressed this without discussing it with the Synod.  Not good.  
 

ICXCNIKA

OC.Net Guru
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
1,537
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Lincoln, Nebraska
Maria said:
Sleeper said:
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
It has been a long overdo house cleaning. Bishop Jerome really needed to be put in his place.
And this is how to put a Vicar Bishop in his place? I would imagine that a simple phone call from his Metropolitan would have been enough to clarify what his instructions/limits are. Why is there a need to call an emergency council and forcibly retire him?
 

LBK

Toumarches
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
13,645
Reaction score
3
Points
38
ICXCNIKA said:
Maria said:
Sleeper said:
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
It has been a long overdo house cleaning. Bishop Jerome really needed to be put in his place.
And this is how to put a Vicar Bishop in his place? I would imagine that a simple phone call from his Metropolitan would have been enough to clarify what his instructions/limits are. Why is there a need to call an emergency council and forcibly retire him?
Perhaps this wasn't his only transgression, and he hadn't paid any mind to previous admonishments.
 

ICXCNIKA

OC.Net Guru
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
1,537
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Lincoln, Nebraska
LBK said:
ICXCNIKA said:
Maria said:
Sleeper said:
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
It has been a long overdo house cleaning. Bishop Jerome really needed to be put in his place.
And this is how to put a Vicar Bishop in his place? I would imagine that a simple phone call from his Metropolitan would have been enough to clarify what his instructions/limits are. Why is there a need to call an emergency council and forcibly retire him?
Perhaps this wasn't his only transgression, and he hadn't paid any mind to previous admonishments.
Possible but I am not sure what transgression occurred. I am not a member of ROCOR and am not trying to pass judgement on them. i like most people are just trying to understand what is going on and what the decree actually means. I have watched as members of clergy have been going at it online arguing as to what this all means. It is not good... I will believe those clergy in RWRV that state there is nothing changing other than Bishop Jerome and Monk Anthony are no longer assistants to the Metropolitan and that they will be doing a better job vetting those allowed to join as clergy.
 

FatherHLL

Archon
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
Points
0
ICXCNIKA said:
Maria said:
Sleeper said:
Shanghaiski said:
Another thread has a more in-depth discussion which seems to question the idea that the Holy Synod killed its WR.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed that until after I created this thread. I hope that's the case and that this is more of a house cleaning, so to speak.
It has been a long overdo house cleaning. Bishop Jerome really needed to be put in his place.
And this is how to put a Vicar Bishop in his place? I would imagine that a simple phone call from his Metropolitan would have been enough to clarify what his instructions/limits are. Why is there a need to call an emergency council and forcibly retire him?
From what I understand the main problem was Bishop Jerome writing public letters to others against Bishop Peter and making a public spectacle and even creating a bit of scandal.  I think the ordinations per se were not what caused the forced retirement.   
 

Orthodox11

Archon
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Mor Ephrem said:
AFAIK, the only tradition that has such a canon is the Byzantine tradition, and it's a later canon.  Every other tradition routinely and for centuries has ordained multiple men to the same rank in the same Liturgy.  Should Bp Jerome be held responsible for violating a canon that ostensibly doesn't apply to the WR? 
Having permission to celebrate the Divine Liturgy and other services according to a particular liturgical tradition does not mean you have permission to follow a different set of administrative rules than those prescribed by your Holy Synod.
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,315
Reaction score
192
Points
63
Age
39
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Sure, I get that as a general principle.  But it seems strange to me to prohibit something normal in the Western Rite based on a specifically Byzantine, non-canonical (as in there is no canon referring to it) custom. 
 

Mor Ephrem

Hypatos
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
36,315
Reaction score
192
Points
63
Age
39
Location
New York!
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
Father H said:
There is no canon forbidding it.  However, most local ordinances do prescribe one of each rank per day per bishop.  ROCOR's local ordinances forbid it, and Bishop Jerome transgressed this without discussing it with the Synod.  Not good.  
Interesting, Father, thanks.  I could never locate a canon to this effect myself, but people I've discussed this with all seemed to think there was one, so I just presumed I didn't look carefully. 

Where/when did this custom originate? 
 

podkarpatska

Merarches
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
9,732
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Northeast United States
Website
www.acrod.org
Mor Ephrem said:
Sure, I get that as a general principle.  But it seems strange to me to prohibit something normal in the Western Rite based on a specifically Byzantine, non-canonical (as in there is no canon referring to it) custom. 
Some of us, who as a condition of our "unfortunate" backgrounds, are unusually "sensitive" to such matters,  and would thus identify this as as an example of "reverse uniatism." You know, if it looks and smells like a rose......
 

age234

High Elder
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
559
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Two weeks on, how are things going in the Western Rite?

I saw that Metr. Hilarion issued a letter that basically says the WR parishes are under his direct jurisdiction now, but I didn't see any indication that he is shutting down the WR.

I recently talked to a priest who is involved with the WR, and I got the sense that there could be schism brewing. I hope it doesn't come to that.
 

Nephi

Protokentarchos
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
4,829
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
30
age234 said:
I recently talked to a priest who is involved with the WR, and I got the sense that there could be schism brewing. I hope it doesn't come to that.
The impression that he (or others) was contemplating schism from Orthodoxy entirely, or just jumping the jurisdictional ship?
 
Top