• A blessed Nativity / Theophany season to all! For users new and old: the forum rules were streamlined when we transitioned to the new software. Please ensure that you are familiar with them. Continued use of the forum means that you (a) know the rules, and (b) pledge that you'll abide by them. For more information, check out the OrthodoxChristianity.Net Rules section. (There are only 2 threads there - Rules, and Administrative Structure.)

The Phantom Time Hypothesis

Volnutt

Hoplitarches
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
15,089
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
34
TIL, some people think that the years 614-911 (and I'm sure a sufficiently motivated conspiracy theorist could make quite a bit of hay about that particular end-year) never happened.

According to [historian Herbert] Illig—who cited zero evidence to back up this claim—Pope Sylvester II, Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, and Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII, all mesmerized by the idea of Christian millenarianism, thought it’d be really cool if they reigned during the year 1000 instead of the relatively drab and boring year 703, so they set their minions to fabricating an entire three-century stretch of time that never actually happened.

Therefore, Charlemagne never existed. Neither did Alfred the Great. According to Illig, Catholic historians invented all these characters in order to pad out history so that the Pope and those two emperors could flatter themselves by claiming to have ruled during the year 1000. As further “evidence” that these three centuries were fabricated out of thin air, Illig points out that there seemed to be no buildings constructed in Constantinople during this time period and no substantial evolution in Church doctrine regarding articles of faith such as purgatory.
 

biro

Protostrator
Site Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
23,373
Reaction score
104
Points
63
Age
47
Website
archiveofourown.org
Alfred the Great would say different.

I wish these people would stop taking LSD.

:police:
 

Volnutt

Hoplitarches
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
15,089
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
34
Schultz said:
There's PLENTY of archaeological evidence to say otherwise.

This is one of the worst conspiracy theories ive ever read.
I know. I love the claim that dendrochronology is inaccurate lol.
 

hecma925

Stratopedarches
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
20,183
Reaction score
340
Points
83
Age
159
Location
The South
Schultz said:
There's PLENTY of archaeological evidence to say otherwise.

This is one of the worst conspiracy theories ive ever read.
+1
 

CarolS

Elder
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
272
Reaction score
0
Points
16
A hilarious idea. So one would need to believe also that a long line of popes and patriarchs never existed as well as all the saints of that era? The person that dreamed this up knows nothing of church history, though perhaps if the iconoclast period had not happened would Islam so easily spread?
 

Schultz

Taxiarches
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Age
45
Location
BaltiCORE, MD
Website
www.theidlegossip.com
CarolS said:
A hilarious idea. So one would need to believe also that a long line of popes and patriarchs never existed as well as all the saints of that era? The person that dreamed this up knows nothing of church history, though perhaps if the iconoclast period had not happened would Islam so easily spread?
It also fails to take into account the archaeological record from non-European locales, like Mexico.  The Mayans were at their height at this period of time, as was Imperial China and the Kingdom of Axum in modern day Ethopia/Eritrea.  All of these places have a well documented timetable that doesn't rely on dendrochronology or even carbon dating, as they were all literate.
 
Top