- Joined
- May 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2,553
- Reaction score
- 59
- Points
- 48
- Location
- North America
- Faith
- Christian
- Jurisdiction
- TBD
There, I'm ready to confront it.
Let's start from Samuel, alright? Let's get a broad perspective. One Samuel there is a priest, and his kids desecrate the temple in essence, and the priest doesn't priest and the kids don't repent, on account of, essentially, God didn't want to forgive them. At least in the Protestant translation, which is just the Kings James English or New Kings James English or any other regular English translation.
It's a scary thing to read however because it also says of the fellow that his sin would not be forgiven. So sort of a double-whammy.
Anyway for a long time I was persuaded that it was just an extra bad sin, and it is. I used to get hung up on the logic, "If I disposess demons by the power of the devil, by whose power do you disposess demons sometimes?" I just wasn't getting it, but the idea is that it is obvious whatever it means, and these people were doing exactly what it sounds like. When you hear it that way it makes a little more sense. God is taunting them here, not reasoning with them. It wasn't so much a thing that they did, as much as it was the thing that they did, which was reject the revelation of God. God was revealed to them, but they hardened their hearts against him. As is suggested in the Epistles to the Hebrews, in the story of Judas, etc. St. Paul in the Hebrews helped clarify this point I think without it we might be at a loss, besides whatever comfort we might gain from St. John.
I would also like to add that I think anyone who commits this sin does indeed earn themselves a special place in hell. It only makes sense.
Let's start from Samuel, alright? Let's get a broad perspective. One Samuel there is a priest, and his kids desecrate the temple in essence, and the priest doesn't priest and the kids don't repent, on account of, essentially, God didn't want to forgive them. At least in the Protestant translation, which is just the Kings James English or New Kings James English or any other regular English translation.
It's a scary thing to read however because it also says of the fellow that his sin would not be forgiven. So sort of a double-whammy.
Anyway for a long time I was persuaded that it was just an extra bad sin, and it is. I used to get hung up on the logic, "If I disposess demons by the power of the devil, by whose power do you disposess demons sometimes?" I just wasn't getting it, but the idea is that it is obvious whatever it means, and these people were doing exactly what it sounds like. When you hear it that way it makes a little more sense. God is taunting them here, not reasoning with them. It wasn't so much a thing that they did, as much as it was the thing that they did, which was reject the revelation of God. God was revealed to them, but they hardened their hearts against him. As is suggested in the Epistles to the Hebrews, in the story of Judas, etc. St. Paul in the Hebrews helped clarify this point I think without it we might be at a loss, besides whatever comfort we might gain from St. John.
I would also like to add that I think anyone who commits this sin does indeed earn themselves a special place in hell. It only makes sense.
Last edited: