Vassula Ryden Excommunicated

Thomas

Archon
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
3,014
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
69
Location
Temple, Texas
I read in a Catholic Magazine about 5-6 years ago an interview with Sister Lucia, one of the seers, who noted that the rejection of Communism by the Russian People and the return to the Orthodox Church and its true veneration of the Mother of God was the interpretation of the vision as she understands it today.  She said that at the time of the visions that some things did not make sense in the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church of the time, but felt that with Vatican II that many of the visions provided became much clearer in meaning, like the conversion of Russia not to Catholicism but to the Church as an entity. I wish I could give you the Citation, but I am not Roman Catholic and read the article in a Dentist's office possibly in the Catholic Digest or some such magazine.  Sister Lucia's revelation of this interpretation brought her under some scorn by some of the more conservative "Armies" of Mary groups that espouse dark  meanings to the secrets of the Fatima Visions.

In Christ,
Thomas
 

ozgeorge

Hoplitarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
16,379
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
54
Location
Australia
Website
www.greekorthodox.org.au
Let me provide you with a few more Roman Catholic citations to show you the "fruits" of Fatima include a belief that Russia can only be saved by converting to Roman Catholicism. Are the multiplicity and variety of these citations a result of the "good seed" which the "Lady" sowed at Fatima? If, as Matthew777 says, we should judge an alledged apparition by it's fruits, then here are some of the fruits of Fatima:

From the Christus Rex website:
“If we do not heed Our Lady's warnings soon, the Her horrible prophesy may well be realized in the near future, even in our own back yards. She told us that God had chosen to use Russia as the instrument of chastisement to punish the whole world if we did not, by our obedience, prayers, and sacrifices, obtain conversion of Russia to the Catholic faith.”
http://www.christusrex.org/www1/apparitions/pr00011.htm
James Likoudis President-Emeritus of the International Catholics United for the Faith (CUF) and a noted writer on catechetics, sex education, and historical theology. He is also a convert to Roman Catholicism from Greek Ortodoxy writes:
“Many who have labored for the union of the Church after Our Lady's 1917 prophecy that "Russia will be converted," have understood it as predicting not only the end of a vicious atheistic Communist rule in Russia, the heartland of the Soviet Empire, but the fulfillment of hopes and dreams for a Catholic Russia. In 1856 the aristocrat-convert Ivan Sergievitch Gagarin, who had become a Jesuit, published a book, "Will Russia become Catholic?" which excited much interest in the possible reunion of the churches. Despite the conversion of a number of prominent Russian individuals and intellectuals to Catholicism, it was corporate reunion that the Popes have always sought with the East, and it is the corporate reunion of entire churches under their patriarchs and Bishops that the Second Vatican Council certainly desired to promote.”
http://credo.stormloader.com/Ecumenic/fatima.htm
Fr. Joaquin Alonso (the official archivist of Fatima), who had talked with Sister Lucy (one of the Fatima visionaries) "many times":
"the 'conversion' of Russia is not to be limited to the return of the Russian people to the Orthodox Christian religions, rejecting the Marxist atheism of the Soviets, but rather, it refers purely, plainly and simply to the total, integral conversion of Russia to the one true Church of Christ, the Catholic Church."
http://www.tldm.org/News7/ConversionOfRussia.htm
Fr. Kramer of “Our Lady's Fatima Apostolate”
The conversion of Russia is identified by Our Lady of Fatima as the very Triumph of Her Immaculate Heart, the focal point of the Message of Fatima. Amazingly, the Ratzinger commentary on the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart in the Vatican booklet on the Secret makes no reference whatever to the conversion of Russia to the Catholic Faith. This conversion of Russia has apparently been written out of the Message of Fatima, never to be mentioned again by the Vatican. Meanwhile, the abortion rate has soared in Russia, its government is dominated by atheistic ‘ex-communists’ and recycled KGB agents, and Russian society is falling to pieces.”
www.fatima.org/news/newsviews/thirdsecret06.asp
If you want a more “traditional” (or what some people like to call “orthodox”) Roman Catholic position, how about “Tradition in Action”: which has this article:
“The Myth of a Converted Russia Exposed “ By Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D. Published in Catholic Family News, March 2001, and the Daily Catholic , February 21, 2002.
“There is a myth that is being spun in Catholic public opinion, a fable about “the new springtime of graces” blowing into Russia since Communism supposedly fell in the 1980’s. Catholic magazines like Inside the Vatican have played their part in nourishing the myth by featuring optimistic stories on great movements of religion and conversion, the fulfillment of the prophecies of Our Lady at Fatima in 1917 Never mind that what is “emerging from the catacombs” are the Schismatic [Orthodox] Churches, not the Roman Catholic Faith.”
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/b007ht.htm
 

Justionios

Jr. Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Sweden Malmö
I have heared that even the Bad-one can sent massage to humans, and that even if you see an angel you can never now if it is God angel or not ? 

Maybe Vasoula and the latins are decived  ???
 

Matthew777

Archon
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
3,497
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Spokane, WA
Website
www.myspace.com
Here's the deal:
We are only human. Therefore, if we come into contact with the divine or the Theotokos, some level of interpretation will creap in. I mean, the seer will attempt to explain the apparition as she understands it from the vantage point of her particular belief system. If the Virgin Mary appeared to a Catholic, she would be explained in Catholic terms. Likewise, if she appeared to an Orthodox Christian, she would be explained in Orthodox terms. Know what I mean?
 

Kizzy

Sr. Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Northeast US
Matthew777 said:
Here's the deal:
We are only human. Therefore, if we come into contact with the divine or the Theotokos, some level of interpretation will creap in. I mean, the seer will attempt to explain the apparition as she understands it from the vantage point of her particular belief system. If the Virgin Mary appeared to a Catholic, she would be explained in Catholic terms. Likewise, if she appeared to an Orthodox Christian, she would be explained in Orthodox terms. Know what I mean?
Matthew, Amen! That is whay I've been trying to say.  To say "I am the Immaculate Conception" does not mean Catholic doctrine...Mary represents the Immaculate conception of Our Lord....She didn't say; here's what i mean...' and provide the Catholic definition... It is the RC church that transposed their doctrine on her words... Everyone sees the world through their own paradigm... and an Atheist seeing the vision and doves at Zeitun might just say it was  a UFO...

In XC, Kizzy





 

Matthew777

Archon
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
3,497
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Spokane, WA
Website
www.myspace.com
I would agree with you.

Furthermore, if Mary were actually conceived without ancestral sin, then wouldn't her acceptance of the conception of Jesus have less meaning? Would that still have been as much of an act of free will?
 

ozgeorge

Hoplitarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
16,379
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
54
Location
Australia
Website
www.greekorthodox.org.au
Kizzy said:
...Mary represents the Immaculate conception of Our Lord....She didn't say; here's what i mean...' and provide the Catholic definition...
Christ said: "I AM the Ressurection and the Life"- did He mean "I represent the Ressurection and the Life"?
Christ said: "I AM the Way, the Truth and the Life"- did He mean "I rperesent the Way the Truth and the Life."
The "lady" of Lourdes said: "I AM the Immaculate Conception", if she means "I represent the Immaculate Conception of Christ" then why didn't the Holy Spirit appear with her and they both say "We ARE the Immaculate Conception." for we say that we believe that Christ was "incarnate of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary."
If this is what the "lady" of Lourdes means as you claim, then she seems to be taking sole credit for the Incarnation of Christ. Not only would this be heresy, but also blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. The "lady" of Lourdes would therefore be guilty of the sin "for which there is no forgiveness either in this world or the next."

Doesn't sound very "lady-like" to me!
 

Ecumenical

Jr. Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Please i would like to read your own opinions and thoughts about this matter.

I would post a link so you can read

http://www.tlig.org/index.html
 

Jennifer

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
1,154
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I don't have an opinion about Vassula Ryden but part of the reason I left Roman Catholicism is to get away from the conservative Catholic obsession with marian apparitions.  I understand that Vassula Ryden is part of that 'world' with the Medjugorje fraud. 
 

Matthew777

Archon
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
3,497
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Spokane, WA
Website
www.myspace.com
On Sunday, the priest's wife, the deacon and I had a conversation on the Orthodox position on the Immaculate Conception. She said that it undermines Mary's free will in accepting the conception and therefore, makes the act itself less meaningful.
On the other hand, she finds it to be a private theologoumena which would can believe, like Mor Ephrem, but is unnecessary to believe.

May peace be upon thee and with thy spirit.
 

Kizzy

Sr. Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Northeast US
Matthew777 said:
On the other hand, she finds it to be a private theologoumena which would can believe, like Mor Ephrem, but is unnecessary to believe.

May peace be upon thee and with thy spirit.
For most of church history the details of the conception of Mary were not specificed by the church and the faithful were left to a 'private theologoumena'.  It is only in reaction to the RC doctrine that the subject has  become one of discussion. However, early writings of the church Fathers reveal a belief in her conception as immaculate- Several of the church Fathers in fact spoke of Mary as immaculate- St. Ephraem and also St. John of Damascus, to name a few. 

In XC, Kizzy

 
 

ozgeorge

Hoplitarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
16,379
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
54
Location
Australia
Website
www.greekorthodox.org.au
Kizzy said:
However, early writings of the church Fathers reveal a belief in her conception as immaculate- Several of the church Fathers in fact spoke of Mary as immaculate- St. Ephraem and also St. John of Damascus, to name a few.
Quote them please.
Even the Orthodox Church calls the Theotokos "Immaculate". She is called "Immaculate" and "Spotless" and "Pure". But where is she said to have been conceived Immaculate?
You're complicating a very simple question Kizzy.
The question is, did the Theotoks (and therefore the Human Nature of Christ) inherit the conditions of the Fall? The Orthodox say "yes", the Roman Catholics say "no." It's that simple.
 

Kizzy

Sr. Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Northeast US
St. Ephraem-  "Most holy Lady, Mother of God, alone most pure in soul and body, alone exceeding all perfection of purity ...., alone made in thy entirety the home of all the graces of the Most Holy Spirit, and hence exceeding beyond all compare even the angelic virtues in purity and sanctity of soul and body . . . . my Lady most holy, all-pure, all-immaculate, all-stainless, all-undefiled, all-incorrupt, all-inviolate spotless robe of Him Who clothes Himself with light as with a garment . ... flower unfading, purple woven by God, alone most immaculate".

The angel Gabriel said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you" (Luke 1:28). The phrase "full of grace" is a translation of the Greek word kecharitomene. It therefore expresses a characteristic quality of Mary.

'Full of grace' is very explicit and is not used to describe anyone else- not St. John the Baptist, or St. Anne... There is something different about the Theotokos as represented by all the language used to describe her in the HB.

In XC, Kizzy


 

Fr. George

Stratopedarches
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
21,870
Reaction score
44
Points
48
Age
39
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Kizzy,

I fail to see where this quote asserts that she was conceived immaculately.  The Fathers do not say she was conceived immaculately because the Orthodox understanding of Sin and the fall makes it unnecessary for her to be conceived immaculately.
 

ozgeorge

Hoplitarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
16,379
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
54
Location
Australia
Website
www.greekorthodox.org.au
cleveland said:
I fail to see where this quote asserts that she was conceived immaculately. The Fathers do not say she was conceived immaculately because the Orthodox understanding of Sin and the fall makes it unnecessary for her to be conceived immaculately.
Exactley. The "immaculate Conception is a stupid solution to a non-existant problem. If the Theotokos was conceived in exactley the same way all of us are conceived, why does she require the "singular priveledge" of an "Immaculate Conception" as defined by Roman Catholics doctrine? In order to reconcile this with Orthodox Doctrine, we would have to say that everyone is conceived immaculate. And there is the further point that if the Theotokos did not inherit the conequences of the Ancesteral Fall ("Original Sin"), then neither did the Human Nature of Christ. How then did they both come to experience the death of the body? And how can Christ save us from the consequences of the Fall by His Death and Ressurection if He Himself did not did not inherit them in His Human Nature taken from the Theotokos?
 

lpap

Sr. Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
228
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Website
www.orthodoxchristianity.net
ozgeorge said:
Didn't St. Gregory of Nyssa believe in apokatasis? Does this make it Orthodox doctrine?
I think that he did not, not in the context you are reffering.

He has talked about "apokatastasis" in the context of Acts 3:21 "whom heaven must receive until the period of restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time." - (greek original: ++++ +¦+¦+¦ ++-à -ü+¦++++++ +++¦++ +¦+¦+++¦-â+++¦+¦ +¦-ç-ü+¦ -ç-ü++++-ë++ +¦-Ç+++¦+¦-ä+¦-â-ä+¦-â+¦-ë-é -Ç+¦++-ä-ë++ -ë++ +¦+++¦++++-â+¦++ ++ +++¦++-é +¦+¦+¦ -â-ä+++++¦-ä++-é -ä-ë++ +¦+¦+¦-ë++ +¦-Ç +¦+¦-ë++++-é +¦-à -ä++-à -Ç-ü++-å++-ä-ë++")

Brother ozgeorge, you can find an essay for this issue here: http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b24.en.life_after_death.08.htm#re2

 

Ecumenical

Jr. Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Well thank you for your guidance i appreciate it.

God Bless

KALO PASxa KAI KALH ANASTASH
 

ozgeorge

Hoplitarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
16,379
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
54
Location
Australia
Website
www.greekorthodox.org.au
Here is an example of St. Gregory of Nyssa's apokatastasis:
‘The avenging flame will be the more ardent the more it has to consume...But at last the evil will be annihilated, and the bad saved by nearness to the good.’
St. Gregory of Nyssa, On The Soul and Ressurrection.
 

Augustine

High Elder
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
565
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Website
www.beyondnihilism.blogspot.com
Kizzy,

St. Ephraem-  "Most holy Lady, Mother of God, alone most pure in soul and body, alone exceeding all perfection of purity ...., alone made in thy entirety the home of all the graces of the Most Holy Spirit, and hence exceeding beyond all compare even the angelic virtues in purity and sanctity of soul and body . . . . my Lady most holy, all-pure, all-immaculate, all-stainless, all-undefiled, all-incorrupt, all-inviolate spotless robe of Him Who clothes Himself with light as with a garment . ... flower unfading, purple woven by God, alone most immaculate".
And alas, not a word of this equals the Latin dogma of the "Immaculate Conception."

The angel Gabriel said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you" (Luke 1:28). The phrase "full of grace" is a translation of the Greek word kecharitomene. It therefore expresses a characteristic quality of Mary.

'Full of grace' is very explicit and is not used to describe anyone else- not St. John the Baptist, or St. Anne... There is something different about the Theotokos as represented by all the language used to describe her in the HB.
You need to stop reading Latin propaganda/apologetical materials, and delve more into the mind of the Church on this matter.  I say this, because your whole line of argumentation sounds like something I would have been pushing a few years ago when I actually was a Roman Catholic!  This is almost word for word what you'll find in a "Catholic Answers" tract.

As Bl.Justin of Serbia said "Papism is the oldest Protestantism."  Whether it be the filioque clause, papal infallibility, or the Immaculate Conception, these are all late coming doctrines whose justification is found through proof texting; which is precisely what Protestants do.  The apple does not fall from the tree, and the only thing which separates the two (Catholicism and Protestantism), is that the former will use a broader well of materials (sources besides the Bible) to concoct their novelties, and has a singular, authoritarian "final interpreter" who when he decides, can endorse one view over another.

The Latins are in this mess, because of their errors regarding grace, and the nature of redemption.  As such, they have incorrect views about the original/ancestral sin, what it is to be "redeemed in Christ", and as a result, just what was true of the "Old Testament Saints."  In fact this is precisely why, while the pre-schism Latins had the Holy Prophets of the Old Testament on their calendar and made Icons of them, they dropped this in the years following their schism from Orthodoxy.  I don't think it's coincidental at all, but reflects their errors on this subject.

Basically, the Latins don't think highly of Old Testament Saints.  I'm not saying they loath them, but they don't know what to make of them.  For example, that the righteous ones who lived before the Advent of Christ could attain divinization, and behold the uncreated Light, and taste profound depths of grace, just doesn't sit well with their view of "original sin", which would seem to preclude this.

OTOH, Orthodoxy has no problem with any of this; what changed with the coming of our Lord, is that He trampeled death, "ontologically destroying death" as Metropolitan Hierotheos puts it in his writings, and established the way for men to become true members of His very Body.  Thus, why those who repose blessed by God now do not descend into Hades; and also why the grace of God abounds all the more amongst men .

As such, the Mother of God does not need to be fundamentally "different" from the other righteous ones of the Old Testament.  In fact, as St.John Maximovitch writes in his little booklet on the Mother of God, the Latin doctrine of the "Immaculate Conception" is actually an implied slight against Her; for it fails to recognize that She became as She was, because of Her life long piety, perfect chastity, and profound asceticism.  The Mother of God is the greatest of hesychasts, and was such before this way was widely known amongst men (and had been only known and practiced amongst certain of the "schools of Prophets", who lived lives not much different from those of New Testament monastics - St.John the Baptist was the last of this type of Old Testament Prophet.)

I have to side with our Church, and St.John in particular who is a modern Saint that addressed specificially this heterodox teaching.  Normally I'm not this insistant, but the Latin "I.C." doctrine is not simply problematic because it is imposed as a dogma, but it's outright erroneous.  Thus it's not even a "theological opinion" to be tolerated.  It's heresy, and if memory serves, was one of the things I had to renounce (along with the "filioque", papal infallibility & universal juristiction, and satan) during my entrance into the catechumate.

 

Irish Hermit

Merarches
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
10,980
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Middle Earth
Irish Hermit said:
Vassula's prophecy about the attack on the Twin Towers as Jesus' punishment for the evils of America

Here is the crux of Jesus said to Vassula: "How can I not breathe on these renegades My Purifying Fire? ... every evil built into Towers will collapse into a heap of rubble and be buried in the dust of sin."

This prophecy was given to Vassula on 11 September 1991 - ten years exactly before the Towers were attacked and collapsed!

Actually the whole prophecy is very heavy and is replete with Jesus' threats of vengeance and destruction. ”here's a lot of hatred in her revelations, mixed in with the sweet stuff.
Huh! Who is this NULL who had added these four paragraphs into my message??!!
And how did he or she manage to do it back in 1969 when I wrote the message only two days ago!!!

« Last Edit: 31 December 1969, 19:00:00 by NULL

 

prodromos

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
1,463
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
55
Location
Back in OZ
What say the log files Bobby? Has the board been hacked or perhaps a back door has been inadvertantly left open?

Hermit, it might be an idea to report the post (even though it is your own) so all the admin's get an email regarding your post's modification.

John
 

Anastasios

Merarches
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
10,557
Reaction score
7
Points
38
Location
Reston, VA
Website
www.anastasioshudson.com
That problem has been around since the last time Bobby upgraded.  I asked him to fix it awhile ago but with him working full time and going to school full time don't expect it to be fixed any time soon :(

Anastasios
 

Bobby

Archon
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Raleigh, NC
yea i had to write an on the fly database converter and it did alter a few posts. As anastasios said, I currently do not have time to fix these small items, but rest assured the board is not hacked and your posts weren't altered by anything malicious.

Thx
Robert
 

Irish Hermit

Merarches
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
10,980
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Middle Earth
prodromos said:
Hermit, it might be an idea to report the post (even though it is your own) so all the admin's get an email regarding your post's modification.
That was the first thing I thought of... and I got this automated reply....

"You can't report your own post to the moderator, that doesn't make sense!"

:-* ;D ::)
 

Aristocles

Merarches
Joined
Apr 23, 2003
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Pittsburgh
Irish Hermit said:
That was the first thing I thought of... and I got this automated reply....

"You can't report your own post to the moderator, that doesn't make sense!"

:-* ;D ::)
Oh yeah?
What about Confession !
 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
I know she has been discussed before, but I can't find the threads. 

Does anyone know if books, booklets, or any other kind of literature have been published refuting her?  I know there are websites which criticise her, but I am looking for something I can hand out to people. 

Unfortunately, there are women at my church who are getting into her.  My priest tells people she's not legitimate.  I also have handed people things printed out from the internet, including the letter criticising her written by the current pope back when he was a cardinal.  However, she still has a very strong draw and the standard reply is that those who oppose her are deceived by the devil. 

There is currently a "Bible study" being run by one of her followers not too far from our church.  A friend of mine who does not believe in Vassula was invited to it by a woman who used to go to our church.  My friend went out of curiosity.  She said they didn't study the Bible at all, just Vassula's writings.  She said the woman who was running it was an Armenian Orthodox who said she attends Catholic masses, even though she is Orthodox.  The woman also emphasized the need to say the Catholic rosary, gave out booklets on how to do the rosary, and spoke about how Vassula has converted to Catholicism now.  This is the first I have heard of Vassula converting to Catholicism.

Now I want people to know I am not "anti-Catholic."  I have friends and relatives who are Catholic, I am a great admirer of many Catholic saints and heroes (such as Mother Teresa) and I personally see nothing wrong with the rosary, although I don't think it is really appropriate for the Armenian Orthodox to say it, when we have so many wonderful, ancient prayers of our own.

However, I was really concerned about what my friend told me about her experience.  It is bad enough that people are being taken in by a woman whom I consider to be a fraud.  However, I am sensing an agenda to bring people from the Orthodox Churches to Catholicism.  I know her messages have a lot to do with "unity."  My experience has been that when certain people promote "unity" they are really talking about the people from one church converting to the other church.

Anyway, I would really appreciate it if anyone knew of some good literature which refutes Vassula.

 

chris

Taxiarches
Site Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Messages
7,253
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
57
Lord have mercy! My local parish had one of these Ryden Den of Vipers a few years ago. It was strange... this pack knew to not discuss their secret meetings with our parish priest since apparently they feared he would disapprove, yet they would recruit other sin our parish because they wanted to spread the word about her.So, like others trapped in wrongdoing and sin, they know enough to hide thier activities yet try to drag others into their situation...

I recently came across this site, which has among other items the 1995 'Notification' about Ms. Ryden from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This is helpful since it shows many of the problems Ms. Ryden is presenting as part of her True Life In God movement:

http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/cafarus/tlignotification1.htm

concluding paragraph:

Given the negative effect of Vassula Ryden's activities, despite some positive aspects, this Congregation requests the intervention of the Bishops so that their faithful may be suitably informed and that no opportunity may be provided in their Dioceses for the dissemination of her ideas. Lastly, the Congregation invites all the faithful not to regard Mrs. Vassula Ryden's writings and speeches as supernatural and to preserve the purity of the faith that the Lord has entrusted to the Church.

Vatican City, 6 October 1995
Now, various people in league with Ms. Ryden have argued that this 'Notification' has been retracted, but the above site shows that this is not the case. (This above document was signed by a certain Cardinal Ratzinger, btw...)

One of the pages within the attached site is titled:

"Eternal condemnation of those who oppose the TLIG messages" and has the following excerpt:

As we have seen previously, TLIG's definition of these sins is modified in order to include whoever openly opposes the messages. It does so by affirming from the start that the messages are divine (in open contradiction with the Catholic Church's Notifications and the position of the Greek Orthodox Church) and that therefore to oppose them is to refuse God and Salvation.
The fact that Ms. Ryden is apparently inventing her own doctrine and threatening 'eternal punishment' for any who disagree with her should set off HUGE WARNING SIRENS in any rational person's head... :eek:

The website is mainly Catholic-oriented, but at least it does acknowledge that the Orthodox Church has not accepted her 'pronouncements' either.
 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Thanks for the info. You said the Vassula group at your church was around "a few years ago."  Did something happen to disband them?  I am assuming your priest found out about it.  How did he handle it when he found out?

I also want to ask if anyone knows of any official written church statements that have been issued about her, besides the Vatican Notification.  I'd like a link or a copy of anything issued by an Orthodox (EO or OO) priest, bishop or patriarch.  I keep hearing that the Greek Orthodox Patriarch excommunicated her, but I have never found any document which shows that.

I have been reading some of her "messages" which are on her website.  It's such drivel.  Some of the messages seem latently sexual in nature.  This is one disturbed woman.
 

Serge

Archon
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
3,198
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Age
54
Website
sergesblog.blogspot.com
Mrs Ryden seems to market to Roman Catholics but she, her teachings and messages have no standing in any church. She simply happens to have been born Greek Orthodox. Don't know if she's been formally excommunicated.
 

prodromos

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
1,463
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
55
Location
Back in OZ
Salpy said:
I keep hearing that the Greek Orthodox Patriarch excommunicated her, but I have never found any document which shows that.
http://www.ecclesia.gr/greek/holysynod/commitees/heresies/heresies-0008.htm

Here's a bit of the link translated into English
Synodal Commission on Heresies and Sects.

"The Commission, having examined the evidence, has reached the conclusion that Vasoula Ryden is excommunicated from the Orthodox Church, although she still presents herself as a member.

"In addition it should be known that the Church periodical "Dialogue" has printed extensive reports regarding Vasoula Ryden's organisation.

"Vasoula has asked the Greek Minister of Justice to bring to trial for slander and libel both the Secretary of the Greek Orthodox Synodal Commission on Heresies, Fr Kyriako Tsoiro, and the Church publication. The trial was scheduled for 30 June 2000; however Ryden withdrew the charge two days before the trial was due to commence.
 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Prodromos,

Thank you again.  This will be a great help.  Did you do the translation yourself, or was it online?  If it is online, can I have the link?  Also, the translation tells about a Church periodical called "Dialogue," which has printed reports about Vassula.  Is that, by any luck, on line and is there an English version of it?  I know it is a lot to hope for, but you never know.    :)
 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
For the sake of being complete, I thought I would post a link to the other thread which I couldn't find earlier:


http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php?topic=5925.from1123478395;topicseen

 

prodromos

OC.Net Guru
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
1,463
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
55
Location
Back in OZ
It was posted by Fr Ambrose on the Catholic Answers forum originally and I think the translating was his own work, though he may have gotten it from elsewhere.

John.
 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
A Vassula follower who has tried recruiting people from my church before is at it again.  This time she is claiming that Pope Shenouda has just recently endorsed Vassula and her messages.

Now I know this can't possibly be true.  However, I know that one of the tactics used by this heretic and her people is to claim that various church leaders have endorsed her when they have not. 

The reason I am writing this is to see if anyone has anything specifically by Pope Shenouda dealing with her.  I know that a little while back the metropolitan of the British Orthodox Church wrote a notice telling people to stay away from her.  Also, the Greek Orthodox Church has excommunicated her and Pope Benedict has written against her.  I want to know, however, if anyone knows of anything directly from Pope Shenouda. 

Here's a link to a thread I started about her last summer:

http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,9511.0.html

 

Salpy

Toumarches
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
14,493
Reaction score
0
Points
36
http://www.britishorthodox.org/113b.php

Above is a link to the memorandum about Vassula written by His Eminence Abba Seraphim of the British Orthodox Church.  It's toward the bottom of the page.
 
Top