What Would The Catholic Church Have To Concede?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Asteriktos

Hypatos
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
39,111
Reaction score
34
Points
48
Age
41
Fabio Leite said:
This?
http://www.myriobiblos.gr/texts/english/photios_mystagogy.html
Unfortunately, no. That doesn't have the introductory material that I am referring to.
 

hecma925

Stratopedarches
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
19,595
Reaction score
46
Points
48
Age
159
Location
The South
xOrthodox4Christx said:
Studying_Orthodoxy said:
Would the Roman Church also have to accept the idea of theosis and also the Orthodox position on icons?
The Orthodox position on Icons is the Patristic and Conciliar position on Icons... so, yes.

Why wouldn't you want to restore such a beautiful Rite? Ah, those were the days.  :'(
Very beautiful chant.
 

dzheremi

Protokentarchos
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
4,417
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Apologies for possibly having spread a piece of bad information. Regarding the Byzantine church using some form of the Mozarabic liturgy in that video, their website (sorry; Spanish only) says that they are a part of ROCOR in communion with the rest of the Russian Orthodox Church and recognize the EP, so I assumed that this means they are a part of Eastern Orthodoxy. I don't know enough about your church to know if that's true or not or if they've split off into something else since writing that or what. They claim to be in communion with canonical Eastern Orthodoxy, anyway.
 

Wandile

Archon
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
3,180
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
Some of the demands here are interesting. What I find most disturbing are that some of these demands impose on the traditions of the Roman church. (Byzantinization)

imagine upon reunion, Rome demanded all eastern churches to keep a celebate clergy, to use a new liturgy, to abandon all post schism saints and apparitions etc... Sometimes its better to avoid conflict if such practices are not contradictory to your own doctrine. We have different traditions and they must be respected :)
 

xOrthodox4Christx

Taxiarches
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
7,322
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Wandile said:
Some of the demands here are interesting. What I find most disturbing are that some of these demands impose on the traditions of the Roman church. (Byzantinization)

imagine upon reunion, Rome demanded all eastern churches to keep a celebate clergy, to use a new liturgy, to abandon all post schism saints and apparitions etc... Sometimes its better to avoid conflict if such practices are not contradictory to your own doctrine. We have different traditions and they must be respected :)
Maybe the celibacy thing. But the new liturgy or at least a renewed liturgy is a must. This won't do.
 

Asteriktos

Hypatos
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
39,111
Reaction score
34
Points
48
Age
41
The Roman Catholic services I've been to were pretty solemn and uneventful.
 

podkarpatska

Merarches
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
9,732
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Northeast United States
Website
www.acrod.org
Michał Kalina said:
Wandile said:
Rome demanded all eastern churches to keep a celebate clergy,
Married Greek Catholic men cannot get ordained in Poland.

Wandile said:
to use a new liturgy
Synod of Zamość.
Michal raises a valid point regarding the schizoid nature of the Roman church's view of Eastern Catholic married clergy. I won't rehash the entire American experience, but I find it beyond bizarre that a young, pious Eastern Catholic man living in Slovakia say in my ancestral village a few clicks (KM) from the Polish border would be welcomed to the Greek Catholic Seminary in Presov, Slovakia, even sent to the Orientale in Rome for further graduate level education, get married, be ordained and faithfully serve the Church in a country like Slovakia with a large Roman Catholic population.

His Eastern Catholic cousin, living across the Tatra Mountains in southern Poland is - well, tough luck buddie - no room in the priesthood for you. Poland of course has a large Roman majority, and one which is historically hostile to any eastern Christians - Orthodox or Catholic. (Ironic as rumors abounded for decades that the maternal grandmother of Blessed JP2 was a Ukrainian Greek Catholic - never officially confirmed in his official bios.)

Now the Roman apologists will tell you that one just has to be careful as to not confuse or scandalize the Roman Catholic majority by allowing married Catholic priests to exist in a land not historically Eastern Christian in orientation - like the United States.

Apparently the Roman Catholics of Poland and the United States  are easily confused and scandalize over very little compared to their Slovak coreligionists. ;) Add the Czech Catholics to the not easily scandalized list as well, my Slovak Eastern Catholic priest cousin is assigned to a Greek Catholic parish in Plsen, Czech Republic......

The Roman Church does not understand the significance of their obstructionist and contradictory positions relative to celibacy in the eastern Church and how it sends to us Orthodox a loud and clear signal that Rome can not be taken at her word - either historically or in the present day.

 

Wandile

Archon
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
3,180
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
Michał Kalina said:
Married Greek Catholic men cannot get ordained in Poland.
Explain the situation first. I haven't heard of this...

Synod of Zamość.
"There is, properly speaking, no separate and distinct rite for the Ruthenians, but inasmuch as the name is often used for the modifications which the Ruthenians have introduced in the Byzantine or Greek Rite as used by them, a brief description is proper. These modifications have come about in two ways. In the first place, the ancient Slavonic missals used in Russia and in Little Russia (Ruthenia) differed in many instances from the Greek as used at Constantinople, and the correction of these differences by the Patriarch Nikon gave rise to the Old Ritualists (see RASKOLNIKS). When, therefore, the Ruthenians came into union with the Holy See in 1595, they brought with them in their liturgical books several of the usages and formulae which Nikon afterwards corrected at Moscow in the Orthodox Church. Where these differences presented no denial or contradiction of the faith the Holy See allowed them to remain, just as they have allowed the rites of many religious orders. In the second place, after the union had become a fixed fact, numbers of the Polish Latin clergy and laity seemed to find in the Greek ceremonies and forms of language some apparent contradictions of the faith as more fully elaborated in the Roman Rite. This seemed to them to indicate a lack of unity of the faith, and the Greek Ruthenian clergy in the Synod of Zamosc (1720) made a number of changes in the Byzantine Rite, particularly that of the Mass, so as more clearly to express the unity and identity of their faith with that of their brethren of the Roman Rite. These changes are sometimes bitterly spoken of by Russian authors as "latinizing", and the majority of them were probably unnecessary. When we consider that the Melchites, Rumanians, and Italo-Greeks have kept the old forms thus unchanged, it does not seem that they were required in order to express the complete unity of the faith. Nevertheless they were sufficient to cause them to be spoken of as the Ruthenian Rite, as distinguished from the older form of the Byzantine Rite (See RITE OF CONSTANTINOPLE; GREEK CATHOLICS IN AMERICA; GREEK CHURCH). "
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13277a.htm

editing a liturgy, although as stated was somewhat unnecessary at times, does not constitute a new liturgy.
Just like I would expect upon reunion in your direction that the NO and TLM would have to be edited so that they conform doctrinally with your church, no?
 

Maria

Toumarches
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
14,023
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
Website
www.euphrosynoscafe.com
Michał Kalina said:
LBK said:
Michał Kalina said:
LBK said:
Michał Kalina said:
Aren't they some vagantes?
This post makes no sense. Could you please rewrite it?
Isn't "Iglesia Oriental Hispana " a vagante group?

More sense?
Thank you.

Are they vagantes? Only if ROCOR is itself a vagante group  ;). Have another look at dzeremi's post.
There are like 10 groups that claim to be ROCOR. How are you sure they are the ROCOR?
ROCOR started breaking up and forming splintering groups when some of the hierarchs in ROCOR started to embrace ecumenism and then made overtures to the MP.  As ROCOR progressed and actually joined the MP, more hierarchs with clergy and laity broke away to form different True Orthodox jurisdictions. These are not vagante groups.

A vagante group would be like the one of those "American Charismatic Orthodox Christian" groups who have never had an Orthodox Bishop oversee them. They are soi disant bishops who claim that the Holy Spirit has anointed them. I will not link to them as several of these vagante groups have threatened lawsuits.

Now back on topic:

If the Catholic Church were to join the Orthodox Church, then they would have to submit to what Orthodoxy has always taught and let go of their errors.
 

ialmisry

Strategos
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
41,794
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Chicago
Wandile said:
Some of the demands here are interesting. What I find most disturbing are that some of these demands impose on the traditions of the Roman church. (Byzantinization)

imagine upon reunion, Rome demanded all eastern churches to keep a celebate clergy, to use a new liturgy, to abandon all post schism saints and apparitions etc... Sometimes its better to avoid conflict if such practices are not contradictory to your own doctrine. We have different traditions and they must be respected :)
says who?

we don't have apparitions to abandon. That's why you would have to abandon yours.
 

Maria

Toumarches
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
14,023
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
Website
www.euphrosynoscafe.com
Michał Kalina said:
Wandile said:
Michał Kalina said:
Married Greek Catholic men cannot get ordained in Poland.
Explain the situation first. I haven't heard of this...
What to explain? It's selfexplantory.
I will back Mike. It was big news about ten years ago when Cardinal Soldano forbade Byzantine Catholic married men from being ordained to the Priesthood in Poland.
 

LBK

Toumarches
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
13,641
Reaction score
0
Points
0
sheenj said:
Michał Kalina said:
On another side they are listed on diocesan directory.
But has that directory been updated since the date they (allegedly) left?
The most recent printed ROCOR directory is from 2013. The church of St Seraphim of Sarov in Seville is listed there.
 

Maria

Toumarches
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
14,023
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
Website
www.euphrosynoscafe.com
orthodox4life said:
Do any of you, who've been Orthodox for awhile, really believe that the Catholics would ever concede?
No, I do not think so.

However, I have known a few very influential Greek Orthodox Priests who have Catholic friends in high places and they want unity with Catholicism. How would that happen without compromises being made such as the New Calendar imposition? What is next? Will the Orthodox come to an agreement concerning the date of Easter as was bantered about in 2000 and compromise again? It seems like the Orthodox are the ones who are compromising.
 

dzheremi

Protokentarchos
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
4,417
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I haven't been Orthodox very long (some would say I'm still not), but I was RC for a while before becoming OO, and come from a mixed RC/non-RC family (my dad's side is all Mexicans and Irish, my mother's Germans and Greenlanders). From where I'm sitting it's not about making the Latins cry "uncle!", but about showing them that their true history is what we already affirm. This won't happen on any large scale, I don't think (barring the recent conversions to both OO and EO communions in South America, which involve some more complicated local and national issues that don't involve Rome conceding anything in the first place), but I'm already proof that it does happen with individuals and/or smaller groups.

You don't have to give anything up to be Orthodox save the things you shouldn't have adopted in the first place, because they were never true to begin with. RC friends of mine have tried to pick on me by saying that it's wrong/misleading/delusional for us in the COC to say that we believe in "one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church", as we say in the Creed. Whenever they make that non-point I like to answer by saying that there is only one clause in the Creed that I had to give up in order to affirm Orthodoxy, and it wasn't the one that they're so hung up on since they think they own the word "Catholic"! ;D

Sometimes baby steps work better than arm wrestling...at least if you want the converted to stay converted.
 

mike

Protostrator
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
24,873
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
29
Location
Białystok / Warsaw
Maria said:
How would that happen without compromises being made such as the New Calendar imposition?
Catholics do not even have unified calendar among themselves.
 

ialmisry

Strategos
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
41,794
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Chicago
dzheremi said:
I haven't been Orthodox very long (some would say I'm still not), but I was RC for a while before becoming OO, and come from a mixed RC/non-RC family (my dad's side is all Mexicans and Irish, my mother's Germans and Greenlanders). From where I'm sitting it's not about making the Latins cry "uncle!", but about showing them that their true history is what we already affirm. This won't happen on any large scale, I don't think (barring the recent conversions to both OO and EO communions in South America, which involve some more complicated local and national issues that don't involve Rome conceding anything in the first place), but I'm already proof that it does happen with individuals and/or smaller groups.

You don't have to give anything up to be Orthodox save the things you shouldn't have adopted in the first place, because they were never true to begin with. RC friends of mine have tried to pick on me by saying that it's wrong/misleading/delusional for us in the COC to say that we believe in "one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church", as we say in the Creed. Whenever they make that non-point I like to answer by saying that there is only one clause in the Creed that I had to give up in order to affirm Orthodoxy, and it wasn't the one that they're so hung up on since they think they own the word "Catholic"! ;D

Sometimes baby steps work better than arm wrestling...at least if you want the converted to stay converted.
Greenlander?  Scandinavian or Inuit?

You are right, as usual, on the other stuff.
 

dzheremi

Protokentarchos
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
4,417
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Judging from my grandmother's looks, I'm guessing Scandinavian. According to family history/legend, that side were in Greenland for centuries and only left beautiful downtown Nuuk or wherever for America roughly 100 years ago (~20 years before my grandmother was born). My middle name comes from Erik the Red (though it's Anglicized), who they say is a distant relative. I'm not sure I believe that, but maybe I'm just proof that you shouldn't marry into families full of squat Latin people if you want to retain your Nordic giantness and translucentivity.

Oh whatever, spell check. You know what I mean.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top